Aligning formula problem
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
y ={}& frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
end{document}
How to align the plus sign with fraction? Thanks.
math-mode equations align amsmath
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
y ={}& frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
end{document}
How to align the plus sign with fraction? Thanks.
math-mode equations align amsmath
New contributor
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use ofleft...right
and use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg
), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the+
is easy.
– daleif
3 hours ago
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
3 hours ago
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to typeint +
in this combination?
– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
y ={}& frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
end{document}
How to align the plus sign with fraction? Thanks.
math-mode equations align amsmath
New contributor
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
y ={}& frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
end{document}
How to align the plus sign with fraction? Thanks.
math-mode equations align amsmath
math-mode equations align amsmath
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
David Carlisle
479k3811121847
479k3811121847
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
August
161
161
New contributor
New contributor
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use ofleft...right
and use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg
), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the+
is easy.
– daleif
3 hours ago
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
3 hours ago
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to typeint +
in this combination?
– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use ofleft...right
and use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg
), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the+
is easy.
– daleif
3 hours ago
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
3 hours ago
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to typeint +
in this combination?
– marmot
2 hours ago
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use of
left...right
and use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg
), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the +
is easy.– daleif
3 hours ago
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use of
left...right
and use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg
), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the +
is easy.– daleif
3 hours ago
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
3 hours ago
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
3 hours ago
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to type
int +
in this combination?– marmot
2 hours ago
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to type
int +
in this combination?– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom
etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl
(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
31 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Alignment is not really necessary and multline
might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
@August As you were doing, withvphantom
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
answered 3 hours ago
Herbert
267k23406716
267k23406716
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
3 hours ago
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
3 hours ago
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom
etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl
(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
31 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom
etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl
(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
31 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom
etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom
etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
answered 3 hours ago
David Carlisle
479k3811121847
479k3811121847
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl
(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
31 mins ago
add a comment |
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl
(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
31 mins ago
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually using
Bigl
(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline– David Carlisle
31 mins ago
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually using
Bigl
(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline– David Carlisle
31 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Alignment is not really necessary and multline
might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
@August As you were doing, withvphantom
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Alignment is not really necessary and multline
might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
@August As you were doing, withvphantom
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Alignment is not really necessary and multline
might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
Alignment is not really necessary and multline
might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
answered 2 hours ago
egreg
703k8618743151
703k8618743151
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
@August As you were doing, withvphantom
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
@August As you were doing, withvphantom
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
2 hours ago
@August As you were doing, with
vphantom
.– egreg
1 hour ago
@August As you were doing, with
vphantom
.– egreg
1 hour ago
add a comment |
August is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
August is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
August is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
August is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464093%2faligning-formula-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use of
left...right
and use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg
), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the+
is easy.– daleif
3 hours ago
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
3 hours ago
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to type
int +
in this combination?– marmot
2 hours ago