Measurement of an inductor not accurate at all












1














I'm trying out a method of measuring the inductance of inductors with a following circuit:



enter image description here



I'm using a signal generator to create the input voltage, and an oscilloscope to read the output across both the resistor and the inductor, as well as across the inductor only. I've found from multiple sources that when you tweak the input frequency such that the voltage across the inductor is one half of the input voltage (across both components), the inductance is given by the formula:



$$L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$$



Here is a picture of my circuit:



enter image description here



The voltage across the inductor is half of the input when the frequency is around 90.9kHz:



enter image description here



As you can see on the right, the peak to peak voltage of the yellow channel is 5.12, while the voltage of the blue channel is 2.56. The frequency fluctuated a bit, but it was around 90.90kHz. The series resistor has a value of 98Ohms as measured by my multimeter.



Using the formula for inductance, I get an inductance of roughly 300uH. However, the actual value of the inductor should be 100uH! So the measurement is completely wrong. What did I so wrong here?



I've read that the method only really works when the series resistance of the inductor is low. I measured it using my multimeter:



enter image description here



It seems to be around 3.3 Ohms. The reactance of the inductor (100uH) at 90.0kHz should be around 57 Ohms, so the series resistance should not cause this much error. I also thought that the output impedance of the generator would make a difference, but I don't see how as the measurement is taken outside of the generator. So what is wrong here?










share|improve this question



























    1














    I'm trying out a method of measuring the inductance of inductors with a following circuit:



    enter image description here



    I'm using a signal generator to create the input voltage, and an oscilloscope to read the output across both the resistor and the inductor, as well as across the inductor only. I've found from multiple sources that when you tweak the input frequency such that the voltage across the inductor is one half of the input voltage (across both components), the inductance is given by the formula:



    $$L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$$



    Here is a picture of my circuit:



    enter image description here



    The voltage across the inductor is half of the input when the frequency is around 90.9kHz:



    enter image description here



    As you can see on the right, the peak to peak voltage of the yellow channel is 5.12, while the voltage of the blue channel is 2.56. The frequency fluctuated a bit, but it was around 90.90kHz. The series resistor has a value of 98Ohms as measured by my multimeter.



    Using the formula for inductance, I get an inductance of roughly 300uH. However, the actual value of the inductor should be 100uH! So the measurement is completely wrong. What did I so wrong here?



    I've read that the method only really works when the series resistance of the inductor is low. I measured it using my multimeter:



    enter image description here



    It seems to be around 3.3 Ohms. The reactance of the inductor (100uH) at 90.0kHz should be around 57 Ohms, so the series resistance should not cause this much error. I also thought that the output impedance of the generator would make a difference, but I don't see how as the measurement is taken outside of the generator. So what is wrong here?










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      I'm trying out a method of measuring the inductance of inductors with a following circuit:



      enter image description here



      I'm using a signal generator to create the input voltage, and an oscilloscope to read the output across both the resistor and the inductor, as well as across the inductor only. I've found from multiple sources that when you tweak the input frequency such that the voltage across the inductor is one half of the input voltage (across both components), the inductance is given by the formula:



      $$L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$$



      Here is a picture of my circuit:



      enter image description here



      The voltage across the inductor is half of the input when the frequency is around 90.9kHz:



      enter image description here



      As you can see on the right, the peak to peak voltage of the yellow channel is 5.12, while the voltage of the blue channel is 2.56. The frequency fluctuated a bit, but it was around 90.90kHz. The series resistor has a value of 98Ohms as measured by my multimeter.



      Using the formula for inductance, I get an inductance of roughly 300uH. However, the actual value of the inductor should be 100uH! So the measurement is completely wrong. What did I so wrong here?



      I've read that the method only really works when the series resistance of the inductor is low. I measured it using my multimeter:



      enter image description here



      It seems to be around 3.3 Ohms. The reactance of the inductor (100uH) at 90.0kHz should be around 57 Ohms, so the series resistance should not cause this much error. I also thought that the output impedance of the generator would make a difference, but I don't see how as the measurement is taken outside of the generator. So what is wrong here?










      share|improve this question













      I'm trying out a method of measuring the inductance of inductors with a following circuit:



      enter image description here



      I'm using a signal generator to create the input voltage, and an oscilloscope to read the output across both the resistor and the inductor, as well as across the inductor only. I've found from multiple sources that when you tweak the input frequency such that the voltage across the inductor is one half of the input voltage (across both components), the inductance is given by the formula:



      $$L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$$



      Here is a picture of my circuit:



      enter image description here



      The voltage across the inductor is half of the input when the frequency is around 90.9kHz:



      enter image description here



      As you can see on the right, the peak to peak voltage of the yellow channel is 5.12, while the voltage of the blue channel is 2.56. The frequency fluctuated a bit, but it was around 90.90kHz. The series resistor has a value of 98Ohms as measured by my multimeter.



      Using the formula for inductance, I get an inductance of roughly 300uH. However, the actual value of the inductor should be 100uH! So the measurement is completely wrong. What did I so wrong here?



      I've read that the method only really works when the series resistance of the inductor is low. I measured it using my multimeter:



      enter image description here



      It seems to be around 3.3 Ohms. The reactance of the inductor (100uH) at 90.0kHz should be around 57 Ohms, so the series resistance should not cause this much error. I also thought that the output impedance of the generator would make a difference, but I don't see how as the measurement is taken outside of the generator. So what is wrong here?







      inductance






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      S. Rotos

      450410




      450410






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          First of all, you should be measuring the voltage across the resistance.
          Because you want to know the current that is flowing in the circuit.



          $ V_R = sqrt{V_S^2 - V_L^2} = sqrt{5.12^2 - 2.56^2} = 4.43V $



          Hence the current is $I = frac{4.43V}{100Omega} = 44.3textrm{mA}$



          The inductor reactance is $X_L = frac{2.56V}{44.3textrm{mA}} = 57.9Omega $



          And finally $L =frac{X_L}{2 pi F} = frac{57.9Omega}{2 pi cdot 91textrm{kHz} } = 101mu H $



          As for your equation, the correct one is:



          $$L=sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{R}{2pi f} =sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{98Omega}{2pi 90 textrm{kHz}} = 100 mu H $$



          And this equation is true only for a frequency at which the (Vgen/Vinductance) = 0.5






          share|improve this answer































            1














            A similar way





            • $L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$> is incorrect and even if L was $sqrt{3}frac{98}{2pi 90k}=14.1~ it ~is ~not~ 300$


            since $Z_L={2pi f}*L$ thus when $ |Z_L|=R,~ $



            $L=frac{R}{2pi f}$



            The equation works out OK if you choose an f << SRF so that R is not too high yet >> Rs of L.



            $L=frac{V_L}{V_R}*frac{1}{2pi f R} ~~= frac{2.56V}{~ 4.43V*~6.28~ *~91kHz~*~98Ω}=103 ~mu H$




            • computing errors from DCR=3.3 Ω may be done or corrected in the formula


            When using a digital scope, it is not necessary to find 50% V point but close is ok , as long as phase shift is 90 deg in the inductor ( no SRC capacitance nor DCR effects visible) but you must use voltage drop across R and L separately ( differential scope mode A-B)






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
              StackExchange.schematics.init();
              });
              }, "cicuitlab");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "135"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f414200%2fmeasurement-of-an-inductor-not-accurate-at-all%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              First of all, you should be measuring the voltage across the resistance.
              Because you want to know the current that is flowing in the circuit.



              $ V_R = sqrt{V_S^2 - V_L^2} = sqrt{5.12^2 - 2.56^2} = 4.43V $



              Hence the current is $I = frac{4.43V}{100Omega} = 44.3textrm{mA}$



              The inductor reactance is $X_L = frac{2.56V}{44.3textrm{mA}} = 57.9Omega $



              And finally $L =frac{X_L}{2 pi F} = frac{57.9Omega}{2 pi cdot 91textrm{kHz} } = 101mu H $



              As for your equation, the correct one is:



              $$L=sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{R}{2pi f} =sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{98Omega}{2pi 90 textrm{kHz}} = 100 mu H $$



              And this equation is true only for a frequency at which the (Vgen/Vinductance) = 0.5






              share|improve this answer




























                3














                First of all, you should be measuring the voltage across the resistance.
                Because you want to know the current that is flowing in the circuit.



                $ V_R = sqrt{V_S^2 - V_L^2} = sqrt{5.12^2 - 2.56^2} = 4.43V $



                Hence the current is $I = frac{4.43V}{100Omega} = 44.3textrm{mA}$



                The inductor reactance is $X_L = frac{2.56V}{44.3textrm{mA}} = 57.9Omega $



                And finally $L =frac{X_L}{2 pi F} = frac{57.9Omega}{2 pi cdot 91textrm{kHz} } = 101mu H $



                As for your equation, the correct one is:



                $$L=sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{R}{2pi f} =sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{98Omega}{2pi 90 textrm{kHz}} = 100 mu H $$



                And this equation is true only for a frequency at which the (Vgen/Vinductance) = 0.5






                share|improve this answer


























                  3












                  3








                  3






                  First of all, you should be measuring the voltage across the resistance.
                  Because you want to know the current that is flowing in the circuit.



                  $ V_R = sqrt{V_S^2 - V_L^2} = sqrt{5.12^2 - 2.56^2} = 4.43V $



                  Hence the current is $I = frac{4.43V}{100Omega} = 44.3textrm{mA}$



                  The inductor reactance is $X_L = frac{2.56V}{44.3textrm{mA}} = 57.9Omega $



                  And finally $L =frac{X_L}{2 pi F} = frac{57.9Omega}{2 pi cdot 91textrm{kHz} } = 101mu H $



                  As for your equation, the correct one is:



                  $$L=sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{R}{2pi f} =sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{98Omega}{2pi 90 textrm{kHz}} = 100 mu H $$



                  And this equation is true only for a frequency at which the (Vgen/Vinductance) = 0.5






                  share|improve this answer














                  First of all, you should be measuring the voltage across the resistance.
                  Because you want to know the current that is flowing in the circuit.



                  $ V_R = sqrt{V_S^2 - V_L^2} = sqrt{5.12^2 - 2.56^2} = 4.43V $



                  Hence the current is $I = frac{4.43V}{100Omega} = 44.3textrm{mA}$



                  The inductor reactance is $X_L = frac{2.56V}{44.3textrm{mA}} = 57.9Omega $



                  And finally $L =frac{X_L}{2 pi F} = frac{57.9Omega}{2 pi cdot 91textrm{kHz} } = 101mu H $



                  As for your equation, the correct one is:



                  $$L=sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{R}{2pi f} =sqrt{frac{1}{3}}frac{98Omega}{2pi 90 textrm{kHz}} = 100 mu H $$



                  And this equation is true only for a frequency at which the (Vgen/Vinductance) = 0.5







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 1 hour ago

























                  answered 2 hours ago









                  G36

                  4,9551511




                  4,9551511

























                      1














                      A similar way





                      • $L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$> is incorrect and even if L was $sqrt{3}frac{98}{2pi 90k}=14.1~ it ~is ~not~ 300$


                      since $Z_L={2pi f}*L$ thus when $ |Z_L|=R,~ $



                      $L=frac{R}{2pi f}$



                      The equation works out OK if you choose an f << SRF so that R is not too high yet >> Rs of L.



                      $L=frac{V_L}{V_R}*frac{1}{2pi f R} ~~= frac{2.56V}{~ 4.43V*~6.28~ *~91kHz~*~98Ω}=103 ~mu H$




                      • computing errors from DCR=3.3 Ω may be done or corrected in the formula


                      When using a digital scope, it is not necessary to find 50% V point but close is ok , as long as phase shift is 90 deg in the inductor ( no SRC capacitance nor DCR effects visible) but you must use voltage drop across R and L separately ( differential scope mode A-B)






                      share|improve this answer




























                        1














                        A similar way





                        • $L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$> is incorrect and even if L was $sqrt{3}frac{98}{2pi 90k}=14.1~ it ~is ~not~ 300$


                        since $Z_L={2pi f}*L$ thus when $ |Z_L|=R,~ $



                        $L=frac{R}{2pi f}$



                        The equation works out OK if you choose an f << SRF so that R is not too high yet >> Rs of L.



                        $L=frac{V_L}{V_R}*frac{1}{2pi f R} ~~= frac{2.56V}{~ 4.43V*~6.28~ *~91kHz~*~98Ω}=103 ~mu H$




                        • computing errors from DCR=3.3 Ω may be done or corrected in the formula


                        When using a digital scope, it is not necessary to find 50% V point but close is ok , as long as phase shift is 90 deg in the inductor ( no SRC capacitance nor DCR effects visible) but you must use voltage drop across R and L separately ( differential scope mode A-B)






                        share|improve this answer


























                          1












                          1








                          1






                          A similar way





                          • $L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$> is incorrect and even if L was $sqrt{3}frac{98}{2pi 90k}=14.1~ it ~is ~not~ 300$


                          since $Z_L={2pi f}*L$ thus when $ |Z_L|=R,~ $



                          $L=frac{R}{2pi f}$



                          The equation works out OK if you choose an f << SRF so that R is not too high yet >> Rs of L.



                          $L=frac{V_L}{V_R}*frac{1}{2pi f R} ~~= frac{2.56V}{~ 4.43V*~6.28~ *~91kHz~*~98Ω}=103 ~mu H$




                          • computing errors from DCR=3.3 Ω may be done or corrected in the formula


                          When using a digital scope, it is not necessary to find 50% V point but close is ok , as long as phase shift is 90 deg in the inductor ( no SRC capacitance nor DCR effects visible) but you must use voltage drop across R and L separately ( differential scope mode A-B)






                          share|improve this answer














                          A similar way





                          • $L=sqrt{3}frac{R}{2pi f}$> is incorrect and even if L was $sqrt{3}frac{98}{2pi 90k}=14.1~ it ~is ~not~ 300$


                          since $Z_L={2pi f}*L$ thus when $ |Z_L|=R,~ $



                          $L=frac{R}{2pi f}$



                          The equation works out OK if you choose an f << SRF so that R is not too high yet >> Rs of L.



                          $L=frac{V_L}{V_R}*frac{1}{2pi f R} ~~= frac{2.56V}{~ 4.43V*~6.28~ *~91kHz~*~98Ω}=103 ~mu H$




                          • computing errors from DCR=3.3 Ω may be done or corrected in the formula


                          When using a digital scope, it is not necessary to find 50% V point but close is ok , as long as phase shift is 90 deg in the inductor ( no SRC capacitance nor DCR effects visible) but you must use voltage drop across R and L separately ( differential scope mode A-B)







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 1 hour ago

























                          answered 2 hours ago









                          Tony EE rocketscientist

                          61.7k22193




                          61.7k22193






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f414200%2fmeasurement-of-an-inductor-not-accurate-at-all%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

                              How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

                              Alexandru Averescu