“A daughter’s life”: the usage of the article
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
What else but sail to save a daughter's life,
and pray she still drew breath?
It seems to me that the article in bold is redundant. Why is it used in this text? Is it grammatically correct?
grammar articles indefinite-article
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
What else but sail to save a daughter's life,
and pray she still drew breath?
It seems to me that the article in bold is redundant. Why is it used in this text? Is it grammatically correct?
grammar articles indefinite-article
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
What else but sail to save a daughter's life,
and pray she still drew breath?
It seems to me that the article in bold is redundant. Why is it used in this text? Is it grammatically correct?
grammar articles indefinite-article
What else but sail to save a daughter's life,
and pray she still drew breath?
It seems to me that the article in bold is redundant. Why is it used in this text? Is it grammatically correct?
grammar articles indefinite-article
grammar articles indefinite-article
asked 6 hours ago
Aer
18510
18510
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
It's the life of a daughter.
The countably singular noun "daughter" needs some determiner, even with the genitive inflection. The indefinite article "a" is the determiner for "daughter", and in turn the genitive phrase "a daughter's" is the determiner for the countably singular "life".
Nothing is redundant. Everything that needs counting is counted.
1
To further prove non-redundancy, let's point out that some article is needed no matter what, even if this particular article were not necessarily the right one for some different statement. "Save daughter's life" couldn't conceivably be correct, in English.
– Beanluc
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Assuming the daughter is the writer's own daughter, the "a" would be incorrect in a strictly mundane grammar lesson on sentence structure. In that case, the sentence would be given as, ".. to save my daughter's life", even if the writer has more than one daughter.
However in this case, by using the indefinite article "a", the author speaks of his own daughter in a general sense, as if she were the daughter of any person in that situation. He moves the context into a more philosophical, universally significant realm to emphasize the emotion which is shared by humanity in general. It makes the story more poignant and moving to the reader.
New contributor
Thanks! This couplet is taken from the ballade about the admiral's life so the narrator is not the admiral.
– Aer
5 hours ago
1
@Aer In that case, the less poetic form would probably be "save his daughter's life" but otherwise Lorel's point still stands.
– John Montgomery
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
It's the life of a daughter.
The countably singular noun "daughter" needs some determiner, even with the genitive inflection. The indefinite article "a" is the determiner for "daughter", and in turn the genitive phrase "a daughter's" is the determiner for the countably singular "life".
Nothing is redundant. Everything that needs counting is counted.
1
To further prove non-redundancy, let's point out that some article is needed no matter what, even if this particular article were not necessarily the right one for some different statement. "Save daughter's life" couldn't conceivably be correct, in English.
– Beanluc
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
It's the life of a daughter.
The countably singular noun "daughter" needs some determiner, even with the genitive inflection. The indefinite article "a" is the determiner for "daughter", and in turn the genitive phrase "a daughter's" is the determiner for the countably singular "life".
Nothing is redundant. Everything that needs counting is counted.
1
To further prove non-redundancy, let's point out that some article is needed no matter what, even if this particular article were not necessarily the right one for some different statement. "Save daughter's life" couldn't conceivably be correct, in English.
– Beanluc
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
It's the life of a daughter.
The countably singular noun "daughter" needs some determiner, even with the genitive inflection. The indefinite article "a" is the determiner for "daughter", and in turn the genitive phrase "a daughter's" is the determiner for the countably singular "life".
Nothing is redundant. Everything that needs counting is counted.
It's the life of a daughter.
The countably singular noun "daughter" needs some determiner, even with the genitive inflection. The indefinite article "a" is the determiner for "daughter", and in turn the genitive phrase "a daughter's" is the determiner for the countably singular "life".
Nothing is redundant. Everything that needs counting is counted.
answered 6 hours ago
Gary Botnovcan
8,755926
8,755926
1
To further prove non-redundancy, let's point out that some article is needed no matter what, even if this particular article were not necessarily the right one for some different statement. "Save daughter's life" couldn't conceivably be correct, in English.
– Beanluc
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
To further prove non-redundancy, let's point out that some article is needed no matter what, even if this particular article were not necessarily the right one for some different statement. "Save daughter's life" couldn't conceivably be correct, in English.
– Beanluc
4 hours ago
1
1
To further prove non-redundancy, let's point out that some article is needed no matter what, even if this particular article were not necessarily the right one for some different statement. "Save daughter's life" couldn't conceivably be correct, in English.
– Beanluc
4 hours ago
To further prove non-redundancy, let's point out that some article is needed no matter what, even if this particular article were not necessarily the right one for some different statement. "Save daughter's life" couldn't conceivably be correct, in English.
– Beanluc
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Assuming the daughter is the writer's own daughter, the "a" would be incorrect in a strictly mundane grammar lesson on sentence structure. In that case, the sentence would be given as, ".. to save my daughter's life", even if the writer has more than one daughter.
However in this case, by using the indefinite article "a", the author speaks of his own daughter in a general sense, as if she were the daughter of any person in that situation. He moves the context into a more philosophical, universally significant realm to emphasize the emotion which is shared by humanity in general. It makes the story more poignant and moving to the reader.
New contributor
Thanks! This couplet is taken from the ballade about the admiral's life so the narrator is not the admiral.
– Aer
5 hours ago
1
@Aer In that case, the less poetic form would probably be "save his daughter's life" but otherwise Lorel's point still stands.
– John Montgomery
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Assuming the daughter is the writer's own daughter, the "a" would be incorrect in a strictly mundane grammar lesson on sentence structure. In that case, the sentence would be given as, ".. to save my daughter's life", even if the writer has more than one daughter.
However in this case, by using the indefinite article "a", the author speaks of his own daughter in a general sense, as if she were the daughter of any person in that situation. He moves the context into a more philosophical, universally significant realm to emphasize the emotion which is shared by humanity in general. It makes the story more poignant and moving to the reader.
New contributor
Thanks! This couplet is taken from the ballade about the admiral's life so the narrator is not the admiral.
– Aer
5 hours ago
1
@Aer In that case, the less poetic form would probably be "save his daughter's life" but otherwise Lorel's point still stands.
– John Montgomery
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Assuming the daughter is the writer's own daughter, the "a" would be incorrect in a strictly mundane grammar lesson on sentence structure. In that case, the sentence would be given as, ".. to save my daughter's life", even if the writer has more than one daughter.
However in this case, by using the indefinite article "a", the author speaks of his own daughter in a general sense, as if she were the daughter of any person in that situation. He moves the context into a more philosophical, universally significant realm to emphasize the emotion which is shared by humanity in general. It makes the story more poignant and moving to the reader.
New contributor
Assuming the daughter is the writer's own daughter, the "a" would be incorrect in a strictly mundane grammar lesson on sentence structure. In that case, the sentence would be given as, ".. to save my daughter's life", even if the writer has more than one daughter.
However in this case, by using the indefinite article "a", the author speaks of his own daughter in a general sense, as if she were the daughter of any person in that situation. He moves the context into a more philosophical, universally significant realm to emphasize the emotion which is shared by humanity in general. It makes the story more poignant and moving to the reader.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
Lorel C.
1842
1842
New contributor
New contributor
Thanks! This couplet is taken from the ballade about the admiral's life so the narrator is not the admiral.
– Aer
5 hours ago
1
@Aer In that case, the less poetic form would probably be "save his daughter's life" but otherwise Lorel's point still stands.
– John Montgomery
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks! This couplet is taken from the ballade about the admiral's life so the narrator is not the admiral.
– Aer
5 hours ago
1
@Aer In that case, the less poetic form would probably be "save his daughter's life" but otherwise Lorel's point still stands.
– John Montgomery
2 hours ago
Thanks! This couplet is taken from the ballade about the admiral's life so the narrator is not the admiral.
– Aer
5 hours ago
Thanks! This couplet is taken from the ballade about the admiral's life so the narrator is not the admiral.
– Aer
5 hours ago
1
1
@Aer In that case, the less poetic form would probably be "save his daughter's life" but otherwise Lorel's point still stands.
– John Montgomery
2 hours ago
@Aer In that case, the less poetic form would probably be "save his daughter's life" but otherwise Lorel's point still stands.
– John Montgomery
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f188331%2fa-daughter-s-life-the-usage-of-the-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown