Constant time evaluation
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I can't get this line to run in constant time on my micro-controller:
int zz,yy; //some binary variables
zz = (yy) ? 0 : (1 & zz);
I tried to change it to
zz = (yy) ? (0 & zz) : (1 & zz);
because &
should force an evaluation of the right side even though the left side defines the result as far as I know. But it did not help.
Can anyone suggest me a solution how to make this line constant time?
c microcontroller
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I can't get this line to run in constant time on my micro-controller:
int zz,yy; //some binary variables
zz = (yy) ? 0 : (1 & zz);
I tried to change it to
zz = (yy) ? (0 & zz) : (1 & zz);
because &
should force an evaluation of the right side even though the left side defines the result as far as I know. But it did not help.
Can anyone suggest me a solution how to make this line constant time?
c microcontroller
Can you clarify what you mean by 'constant time'? I would consider this O(1), so do you mean something else, or ...?
– Austin Hastings
Nov 22 at 16:00
by constant time, I mean that it always should takex
cycles running on my microcontroller,x
should be equal for both cases0
and1&zz
– jonnyx
Nov 22 at 16:01
5
It entirely depends on your compiler and its settings. Maybe(!yy) * (1 & zz)
helps?
– Quentin
Nov 22 at 16:03
1
it is not about optimization, it is about being constant time (which often implies slower code)
– jonnyx
Nov 24 at 19:35
1
Take a look at Hacker's Delight for more ideas. Or search for "bit twiddling".
– starblue
Nov 25 at 10:53
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I can't get this line to run in constant time on my micro-controller:
int zz,yy; //some binary variables
zz = (yy) ? 0 : (1 & zz);
I tried to change it to
zz = (yy) ? (0 & zz) : (1 & zz);
because &
should force an evaluation of the right side even though the left side defines the result as far as I know. But it did not help.
Can anyone suggest me a solution how to make this line constant time?
c microcontroller
I can't get this line to run in constant time on my micro-controller:
int zz,yy; //some binary variables
zz = (yy) ? 0 : (1 & zz);
I tried to change it to
zz = (yy) ? (0 & zz) : (1 & zz);
because &
should force an evaluation of the right side even though the left side defines the result as far as I know. But it did not help.
Can anyone suggest me a solution how to make this line constant time?
c microcontroller
c microcontroller
edited Nov 26 at 15:06
Stoogy
552422
552422
asked Nov 22 at 15:56
jonnyx
1059
1059
Can you clarify what you mean by 'constant time'? I would consider this O(1), so do you mean something else, or ...?
– Austin Hastings
Nov 22 at 16:00
by constant time, I mean that it always should takex
cycles running on my microcontroller,x
should be equal for both cases0
and1&zz
– jonnyx
Nov 22 at 16:01
5
It entirely depends on your compiler and its settings. Maybe(!yy) * (1 & zz)
helps?
– Quentin
Nov 22 at 16:03
1
it is not about optimization, it is about being constant time (which often implies slower code)
– jonnyx
Nov 24 at 19:35
1
Take a look at Hacker's Delight for more ideas. Or search for "bit twiddling".
– starblue
Nov 25 at 10:53
|
show 5 more comments
Can you clarify what you mean by 'constant time'? I would consider this O(1), so do you mean something else, or ...?
– Austin Hastings
Nov 22 at 16:00
by constant time, I mean that it always should takex
cycles running on my microcontroller,x
should be equal for both cases0
and1&zz
– jonnyx
Nov 22 at 16:01
5
It entirely depends on your compiler and its settings. Maybe(!yy) * (1 & zz)
helps?
– Quentin
Nov 22 at 16:03
1
it is not about optimization, it is about being constant time (which often implies slower code)
– jonnyx
Nov 24 at 19:35
1
Take a look at Hacker's Delight for more ideas. Or search for "bit twiddling".
– starblue
Nov 25 at 10:53
Can you clarify what you mean by 'constant time'? I would consider this O(1), so do you mean something else, or ...?
– Austin Hastings
Nov 22 at 16:00
Can you clarify what you mean by 'constant time'? I would consider this O(1), so do you mean something else, or ...?
– Austin Hastings
Nov 22 at 16:00
by constant time, I mean that it always should take
x
cycles running on my microcontroller, x
should be equal for both cases 0
and 1&zz
– jonnyx
Nov 22 at 16:01
by constant time, I mean that it always should take
x
cycles running on my microcontroller, x
should be equal for both cases 0
and 1&zz
– jonnyx
Nov 22 at 16:01
5
5
It entirely depends on your compiler and its settings. Maybe
(!yy) * (1 & zz)
helps?– Quentin
Nov 22 at 16:03
It entirely depends on your compiler and its settings. Maybe
(!yy) * (1 & zz)
helps?– Quentin
Nov 22 at 16:03
1
1
it is not about optimization, it is about being constant time (which often implies slower code)
– jonnyx
Nov 24 at 19:35
it is not about optimization, it is about being constant time (which often implies slower code)
– jonnyx
Nov 24 at 19:35
1
1
Take a look at Hacker's Delight for more ideas. Or search for "bit twiddling".
– starblue
Nov 25 at 10:53
Take a look at Hacker's Delight for more ideas. Or search for "bit twiddling".
– starblue
Nov 25 at 10:53
|
show 5 more comments
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434554%2fconstant-time-evaluation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you clarify what you mean by 'constant time'? I would consider this O(1), so do you mean something else, or ...?
– Austin Hastings
Nov 22 at 16:00
by constant time, I mean that it always should take
x
cycles running on my microcontroller,x
should be equal for both cases0
and1&zz
– jonnyx
Nov 22 at 16:01
5
It entirely depends on your compiler and its settings. Maybe
(!yy) * (1 & zz)
helps?– Quentin
Nov 22 at 16:03
1
it is not about optimization, it is about being constant time (which often implies slower code)
– jonnyx
Nov 24 at 19:35
1
Take a look at Hacker's Delight for more ideas. Or search for "bit twiddling".
– starblue
Nov 25 at 10:53