Using “proximity” to imply “next to each other”
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently writing the introduction to my thesis and I want to say that two genes are next to each other. I would like to use the word "proximity" without saying "close proximity" but am unsure whether it implies the closeness that I want the sentence to.
I have read the thread regarding "close proximity" as a tautology and fear that choosing to use it in my thesis will be considered unsophisticated or be marked as poor language usage.
I have considered using "beside" or "next to" as in "the genes are beside/next to each other" but feel that it is too unsophisticated.
In context, this is what I have:
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their proximity suggests that both are ..."
I'm open to suggestions other than "proximity" as well.
word-choice nouns expression-choice
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently writing the introduction to my thesis and I want to say that two genes are next to each other. I would like to use the word "proximity" without saying "close proximity" but am unsure whether it implies the closeness that I want the sentence to.
I have read the thread regarding "close proximity" as a tautology and fear that choosing to use it in my thesis will be considered unsophisticated or be marked as poor language usage.
I have considered using "beside" or "next to" as in "the genes are beside/next to each other" but feel that it is too unsophisticated.
In context, this is what I have:
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their proximity suggests that both are ..."
I'm open to suggestions other than "proximity" as well.
word-choice nouns expression-choice
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am currently writing the introduction to my thesis and I want to say that two genes are next to each other. I would like to use the word "proximity" without saying "close proximity" but am unsure whether it implies the closeness that I want the sentence to.
I have read the thread regarding "close proximity" as a tautology and fear that choosing to use it in my thesis will be considered unsophisticated or be marked as poor language usage.
I have considered using "beside" or "next to" as in "the genes are beside/next to each other" but feel that it is too unsophisticated.
In context, this is what I have:
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their proximity suggests that both are ..."
I'm open to suggestions other than "proximity" as well.
word-choice nouns expression-choice
New contributor
I am currently writing the introduction to my thesis and I want to say that two genes are next to each other. I would like to use the word "proximity" without saying "close proximity" but am unsure whether it implies the closeness that I want the sentence to.
I have read the thread regarding "close proximity" as a tautology and fear that choosing to use it in my thesis will be considered unsophisticated or be marked as poor language usage.
I have considered using "beside" or "next to" as in "the genes are beside/next to each other" but feel that it is too unsophisticated.
In context, this is what I have:
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their proximity suggests that both are ..."
I'm open to suggestions other than "proximity" as well.
word-choice nouns expression-choice
word-choice nouns expression-choice
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 45 mins ago
Shion
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
You could use "adjacency" instead. That means "the quality of being directly next to."
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I agree something like
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
coterminality suggests that both are
would seem contrived and open to questioning as more often used in legalise, also
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
congeniality suggests that both are
is likely to raise a genetic eyebrow or two.
adjacency, contiguity and propinquity
are near potentials.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
You could use "adjacency" instead. That means "the quality of being directly next to."
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You could use "adjacency" instead. That means "the quality of being directly next to."
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You could use "adjacency" instead. That means "the quality of being directly next to."
New contributor
You could use "adjacency" instead. That means "the quality of being directly next to."
New contributor
New contributor
answered 29 mins ago
Drakon007
853
853
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I agree something like
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
coterminality suggests that both are
would seem contrived and open to questioning as more often used in legalise, also
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
congeniality suggests that both are
is likely to raise a genetic eyebrow or two.
adjacency, contiguity and propinquity
are near potentials.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I agree something like
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
coterminality suggests that both are
would seem contrived and open to questioning as more often used in legalise, also
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
congeniality suggests that both are
is likely to raise a genetic eyebrow or two.
adjacency, contiguity and propinquity
are near potentials.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I agree something like
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
coterminality suggests that both are
would seem contrived and open to questioning as more often used in legalise, also
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
congeniality suggests that both are
is likely to raise a genetic eyebrow or two.
adjacency, contiguity and propinquity
are near potentials.
I agree something like
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
coterminality suggests that both are
would seem contrived and open to questioning as more often used in legalise, also
"Both genes are located on chromosome 1 (for example) and their
congeniality suggests that both are
is likely to raise a genetic eyebrow or two.
adjacency, contiguity and propinquity
are near potentials.
answered 26 mins ago
KJO
1,834313
1,834313
add a comment |
add a comment |
Shion is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Shion is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Shion is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Shion is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476356%2fusing-proximity-to-imply-next-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown