Map of Grassmannians associated with a Veronese embedding
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I'm quite sure this should be classically known, however I am not an expert of the topic and I was unable to find a precise reference in the huge literature concerning Veronese embeddings and Grassmannians. Any pointer to the relevant literature will be appreciated.
Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space (over $mathbb{C}$, say) and let $v_n colon mathbb{P}(V) longrightarrow mathbb{P}(S^n V)$ be the usual $n$th Veronese embedding.
If $ell$ is a line in $mathbb{P}(V)$, then $v_n(ell)$ is a rational normal curve of degree $n$, that will be contained in precisely one $n$-plane $Pi_{ell} subset mathbb{P}(S^n V)$. Then we can define a morphism of projective Grassmannians $$psi_n colon mathbb{G}(1, , mathbb{P}(V)) longrightarrow mathbb{G}(n, , mathbb{P}(S^nV)),$$
given by $psi_n(ell) :=Pi_{ell}$.
Question. Is $psi_n$ an embedding?
ag.algebraic-geometry reference-request grassmannians
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I'm quite sure this should be classically known, however I am not an expert of the topic and I was unable to find a precise reference in the huge literature concerning Veronese embeddings and Grassmannians. Any pointer to the relevant literature will be appreciated.
Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space (over $mathbb{C}$, say) and let $v_n colon mathbb{P}(V) longrightarrow mathbb{P}(S^n V)$ be the usual $n$th Veronese embedding.
If $ell$ is a line in $mathbb{P}(V)$, then $v_n(ell)$ is a rational normal curve of degree $n$, that will be contained in precisely one $n$-plane $Pi_{ell} subset mathbb{P}(S^n V)$. Then we can define a morphism of projective Grassmannians $$psi_n colon mathbb{G}(1, , mathbb{P}(V)) longrightarrow mathbb{G}(n, , mathbb{P}(S^nV)),$$
given by $psi_n(ell) :=Pi_{ell}$.
Question. Is $psi_n$ an embedding?
ag.algebraic-geometry reference-request grassmannians
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I'm quite sure this should be classically known, however I am not an expert of the topic and I was unable to find a precise reference in the huge literature concerning Veronese embeddings and Grassmannians. Any pointer to the relevant literature will be appreciated.
Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space (over $mathbb{C}$, say) and let $v_n colon mathbb{P}(V) longrightarrow mathbb{P}(S^n V)$ be the usual $n$th Veronese embedding.
If $ell$ is a line in $mathbb{P}(V)$, then $v_n(ell)$ is a rational normal curve of degree $n$, that will be contained in precisely one $n$-plane $Pi_{ell} subset mathbb{P}(S^n V)$. Then we can define a morphism of projective Grassmannians $$psi_n colon mathbb{G}(1, , mathbb{P}(V)) longrightarrow mathbb{G}(n, , mathbb{P}(S^nV)),$$
given by $psi_n(ell) :=Pi_{ell}$.
Question. Is $psi_n$ an embedding?
ag.algebraic-geometry reference-request grassmannians
I'm quite sure this should be classically known, however I am not an expert of the topic and I was unable to find a precise reference in the huge literature concerning Veronese embeddings and Grassmannians. Any pointer to the relevant literature will be appreciated.
Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space (over $mathbb{C}$, say) and let $v_n colon mathbb{P}(V) longrightarrow mathbb{P}(S^n V)$ be the usual $n$th Veronese embedding.
If $ell$ is a line in $mathbb{P}(V)$, then $v_n(ell)$ is a rational normal curve of degree $n$, that will be contained in precisely one $n$-plane $Pi_{ell} subset mathbb{P}(S^n V)$. Then we can define a morphism of projective Grassmannians $$psi_n colon mathbb{G}(1, , mathbb{P}(V)) longrightarrow mathbb{G}(n, , mathbb{P}(S^nV)),$$
given by $psi_n(ell) :=Pi_{ell}$.
Question. Is $psi_n$ an embedding?
ag.algebraic-geometry reference-request grassmannians
ag.algebraic-geometry reference-request grassmannians
edited 4 hours ago
Francois Ziegler
19.5k371116
19.5k371116
asked 6 hours ago
Francesco Polizzi
47.2k3125202
47.2k3125202
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
$$
G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
$$
where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
$$
p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
$$
Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
$$
epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
$$
(the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).
The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
$$
p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
$$
It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
$$
nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
$$
(it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.
And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
– Francois Ziegler
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
$$
G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
$$
where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
$$
p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
$$
Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
$$
epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
$$
(the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).
The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
$$
p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
$$
It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
$$
nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
$$
(it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.
And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
– Francois Ziegler
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
$$
G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
$$
where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
$$
p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
$$
Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
$$
epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
$$
(the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).
The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
$$
p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
$$
It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
$$
nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
$$
(it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.
And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
– Francois Ziegler
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
$$
G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
$$
where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
$$
p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
$$
Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
$$
epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
$$
(the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).
The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
$$
p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
$$
It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
$$
nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
$$
(it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.
I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
$$
G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
$$
where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
$$
p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
$$
Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
$$
epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
$$
(the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).
The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
$$
p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
$$
It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
$$
nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
$$
(it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.
answered 5 hours ago
Sasha
20.1k22652
20.1k22652
And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
– Francois Ziegler
4 hours ago
add a comment |
And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
– Francois Ziegler
4 hours ago
And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
– Francois Ziegler
4 hours ago
And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
– Francois Ziegler
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317536%2fmap-of-grassmannians-associated-with-a-veronese-embedding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown