Map of Grassmannians associated with a Veronese embedding











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












I'm quite sure this should be classically known, however I am not an expert of the topic and I was unable to find a precise reference in the huge literature concerning Veronese embeddings and Grassmannians. Any pointer to the relevant literature will be appreciated.



Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space (over $mathbb{C}$, say) and let $v_n colon mathbb{P}(V) longrightarrow mathbb{P}(S^n V)$ be the usual $n$th Veronese embedding.



If $ell$ is a line in $mathbb{P}(V)$, then $v_n(ell)$ is a rational normal curve of degree $n$, that will be contained in precisely one $n$-plane $Pi_{ell} subset mathbb{P}(S^n V)$. Then we can define a morphism of projective Grassmannians $$psi_n colon mathbb{G}(1, , mathbb{P}(V)) longrightarrow mathbb{G}(n, , mathbb{P}(S^nV)),$$
given by $psi_n(ell) :=Pi_{ell}$.




Question. Is $psi_n$ an embedding?











share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I'm quite sure this should be classically known, however I am not an expert of the topic and I was unable to find a precise reference in the huge literature concerning Veronese embeddings and Grassmannians. Any pointer to the relevant literature will be appreciated.



    Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space (over $mathbb{C}$, say) and let $v_n colon mathbb{P}(V) longrightarrow mathbb{P}(S^n V)$ be the usual $n$th Veronese embedding.



    If $ell$ is a line in $mathbb{P}(V)$, then $v_n(ell)$ is a rational normal curve of degree $n$, that will be contained in precisely one $n$-plane $Pi_{ell} subset mathbb{P}(S^n V)$. Then we can define a morphism of projective Grassmannians $$psi_n colon mathbb{G}(1, , mathbb{P}(V)) longrightarrow mathbb{G}(n, , mathbb{P}(S^nV)),$$
    given by $psi_n(ell) :=Pi_{ell}$.




    Question. Is $psi_n$ an embedding?











    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I'm quite sure this should be classically known, however I am not an expert of the topic and I was unable to find a precise reference in the huge literature concerning Veronese embeddings and Grassmannians. Any pointer to the relevant literature will be appreciated.



      Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space (over $mathbb{C}$, say) and let $v_n colon mathbb{P}(V) longrightarrow mathbb{P}(S^n V)$ be the usual $n$th Veronese embedding.



      If $ell$ is a line in $mathbb{P}(V)$, then $v_n(ell)$ is a rational normal curve of degree $n$, that will be contained in precisely one $n$-plane $Pi_{ell} subset mathbb{P}(S^n V)$. Then we can define a morphism of projective Grassmannians $$psi_n colon mathbb{G}(1, , mathbb{P}(V)) longrightarrow mathbb{G}(n, , mathbb{P}(S^nV)),$$
      given by $psi_n(ell) :=Pi_{ell}$.




      Question. Is $psi_n$ an embedding?











      share|cite|improve this question















      I'm quite sure this should be classically known, however I am not an expert of the topic and I was unable to find a precise reference in the huge literature concerning Veronese embeddings and Grassmannians. Any pointer to the relevant literature will be appreciated.



      Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space (over $mathbb{C}$, say) and let $v_n colon mathbb{P}(V) longrightarrow mathbb{P}(S^n V)$ be the usual $n$th Veronese embedding.



      If $ell$ is a line in $mathbb{P}(V)$, then $v_n(ell)$ is a rational normal curve of degree $n$, that will be contained in precisely one $n$-plane $Pi_{ell} subset mathbb{P}(S^n V)$. Then we can define a morphism of projective Grassmannians $$psi_n colon mathbb{G}(1, , mathbb{P}(V)) longrightarrow mathbb{G}(n, , mathbb{P}(S^nV)),$$
      given by $psi_n(ell) :=Pi_{ell}$.




      Question. Is $psi_n$ an embedding?








      ag.algebraic-geometry reference-request grassmannians






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      Francois Ziegler

      19.5k371116




      19.5k371116










      asked 6 hours ago









      Francesco Polizzi

      47.2k3125202




      47.2k3125202






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
          $$
          G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
          $$

          where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
          $$
          p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
          $$

          Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
          $$
          epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
          $$

          (the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).



          The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
          $$
          p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
          $$

          It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
          $$
          nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
          $$

          (it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
            – Francois Ziegler
            4 hours ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317536%2fmap-of-grassmannians-associated-with-a-veronese-embedding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote













          I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
          $$
          G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
          $$

          where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
          $$
          p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
          $$

          Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
          $$
          epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
          $$

          (the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).



          The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
          $$
          p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
          $$

          It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
          $$
          nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
          $$

          (it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
            – Francois Ziegler
            4 hours ago

















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
          $$
          G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
          $$

          where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
          $$
          p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
          $$

          Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
          $$
          epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
          $$

          (the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).



          The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
          $$
          p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
          $$

          It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
          $$
          nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
          $$

          (it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
            – Francois Ziegler
            4 hours ago















          up vote
          6
          down vote










          up vote
          6
          down vote









          I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
          $$
          G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
          $$

          where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
          $$
          p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
          $$

          Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
          $$
          epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
          $$

          (the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).



          The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
          $$
          p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
          $$

          It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
          $$
          nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
          $$

          (it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          I don't know a reference, but here is a simple argument. Note that $G(2,V)$ (let me use linear notation) is a homogeneous space for $GL(V)$:
          $$
          G(2,V) = GL(V)/P_2,
          $$

          where $P_2$ is a parabolic. If $e_1,dots,e_N$ is the basis of $V$, we can take $P_2$ to be the stabilizer of the point
          $$
          p_1 := [e_1 wedge e_2] in mathbb{P}(wedge^2V).
          $$

          Note that $e_1 wedge e_2$ is the highest weight vector with weight
          $$
          epsilon_1 + epsilon_2 = omega_2
          $$

          (the second fundamental weight of $GL(V)$).



          The map $psi_n$ is $GL(V)$-equivariant, and takes $[e_1 wedge e_2]$ to
          $$
          p_n := [(e_1^n) wedge (e_1^{n-1}e_2) wedge dots wedge (e_1e_2^{n-1}) wedge (e_2^n)].
          $$

          It is easy to check that this is a highest vector with weight
          $$
          nepsilon_1 + ((n-1)epsilon_1 + epsilon_2) + dots (epsilon_1 + (n-1)epsilon_2) + nepsilon_2 = binom{n+1}{2}omega_2
          $$

          (it corresponds to an irreducible subrepresentation $V_{binom{n+1}{2}omega_2} subset wedge^{n+1}(S^nV)$), and its stabilizer is the same parabolic subgroup $P_2$. It follows that $psi_n$ is an isomorphism onto the orbit of the point $p_n$, in particular it is an embedding.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          Sasha

          20.1k22652




          20.1k22652












          • And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
            – Francois Ziegler
            4 hours ago




















          • And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
            – Francois Ziegler
            4 hours ago


















          And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
          – Francois Ziegler
          4 hours ago






          And both are special cases of the Borel-Weil-Tits embedding of $G/P_2$ into projective space of its geometric quantization, when endowed with its symplectic structure as coadjoint orbit of $omega_2$, resp. ${n+1choose 2}omega_2$.
          – Francois Ziegler
          4 hours ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317536%2fmap-of-grassmannians-associated-with-a-veronese-embedding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          Alexandru Averescu

          Trompette piccolo