stargazer R: Display mulitple regression with different data next to each other











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I´m wirting on my bachelor´s thesis and have a problem with the stragazer function in R.
Basic question: What drives unemployment? Therefore I ran a logit-regression to estimate what factors raise the probability to get unemployed. I have 7 different data frames of 7 different years, so I run 7 different logit regressions with the same dependent (and independent) variables. (In this case its only the effect of age i´m interested in.



logit17 <- glm(formula = data17$AL ~  data17$age,
family = "binomial", data = data17)
logit16 <- glm(formula = dataP_16$AL ~ dataP_16$age,
family = "binomial", data = data16)


So far so easy. The problem I am facing now:
When running the regressions through stargazer, the out output looks like the following:



stargazer output



Apparently stargazer recognizes age as two different variables (which they kinda are, because it´s a different data set). In addtion, when I insert more variables and the regressions of the other years the table gets extremly long.



My question: Is there any function to avoid these huge tables? I guess I somehow need to tell stargazer that it should treat age and the other variable as one.
Thanks










share|improve this question
























  • The modeling function code should be: glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to the glm function with the data argument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
    – eipi10
    Nov 22 at 17:00












  • thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
    – rstarter
    Nov 23 at 13:37















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I´m wirting on my bachelor´s thesis and have a problem with the stragazer function in R.
Basic question: What drives unemployment? Therefore I ran a logit-regression to estimate what factors raise the probability to get unemployed. I have 7 different data frames of 7 different years, so I run 7 different logit regressions with the same dependent (and independent) variables. (In this case its only the effect of age i´m interested in.



logit17 <- glm(formula = data17$AL ~  data17$age,
family = "binomial", data = data17)
logit16 <- glm(formula = dataP_16$AL ~ dataP_16$age,
family = "binomial", data = data16)


So far so easy. The problem I am facing now:
When running the regressions through stargazer, the out output looks like the following:



stargazer output



Apparently stargazer recognizes age as two different variables (which they kinda are, because it´s a different data set). In addtion, when I insert more variables and the regressions of the other years the table gets extremly long.



My question: Is there any function to avoid these huge tables? I guess I somehow need to tell stargazer that it should treat age and the other variable as one.
Thanks










share|improve this question
























  • The modeling function code should be: glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to the glm function with the data argument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
    – eipi10
    Nov 22 at 17:00












  • thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
    – rstarter
    Nov 23 at 13:37













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I´m wirting on my bachelor´s thesis and have a problem with the stragazer function in R.
Basic question: What drives unemployment? Therefore I ran a logit-regression to estimate what factors raise the probability to get unemployed. I have 7 different data frames of 7 different years, so I run 7 different logit regressions with the same dependent (and independent) variables. (In this case its only the effect of age i´m interested in.



logit17 <- glm(formula = data17$AL ~  data17$age,
family = "binomial", data = data17)
logit16 <- glm(formula = dataP_16$AL ~ dataP_16$age,
family = "binomial", data = data16)


So far so easy. The problem I am facing now:
When running the regressions through stargazer, the out output looks like the following:



stargazer output



Apparently stargazer recognizes age as two different variables (which they kinda are, because it´s a different data set). In addtion, when I insert more variables and the regressions of the other years the table gets extremly long.



My question: Is there any function to avoid these huge tables? I guess I somehow need to tell stargazer that it should treat age and the other variable as one.
Thanks










share|improve this question















I´m wirting on my bachelor´s thesis and have a problem with the stragazer function in R.
Basic question: What drives unemployment? Therefore I ran a logit-regression to estimate what factors raise the probability to get unemployed. I have 7 different data frames of 7 different years, so I run 7 different logit regressions with the same dependent (and independent) variables. (In this case its only the effect of age i´m interested in.



logit17 <- glm(formula = data17$AL ~  data17$age,
family = "binomial", data = data17)
logit16 <- glm(formula = dataP_16$AL ~ dataP_16$age,
family = "binomial", data = data16)


So far so easy. The problem I am facing now:
When running the regressions through stargazer, the out output looks like the following:



stargazer output



Apparently stargazer recognizes age as two different variables (which they kinda are, because it´s a different data set). In addtion, when I insert more variables and the regressions of the other years the table gets extremly long.



My question: Is there any function to avoid these huge tables? I guess I somehow need to tell stargazer that it should treat age and the other variable as one.
Thanks







r regression stargazer






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 16:53









eipi10

57.9k15101154




57.9k15101154










asked Nov 22 at 15:32









rstarter

1




1












  • The modeling function code should be: glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to the glm function with the data argument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
    – eipi10
    Nov 22 at 17:00












  • thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
    – rstarter
    Nov 23 at 13:37


















  • The modeling function code should be: glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to the glm function with the data argument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
    – eipi10
    Nov 22 at 17:00












  • thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
    – rstarter
    Nov 23 at 13:37
















The modeling function code should be: glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to the glm function with the data argument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
– eipi10
Nov 22 at 17:00






The modeling function code should be: glm(formula = AL ~ age, family = "binomial", data = data17). In other words, don't restate the data frame name in the formula. It's not necessary to do so, because you passed the data frame to the glm function with the data argument, and it can have undesirable effects, as explained here.
– eipi10
Nov 22 at 17:00














thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
– rstarter
Nov 23 at 13:37




thanks a lot - this solves my problem!
– rstarter
Nov 23 at 13:37

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434182%2fstargazer-r-display-mulitple-regression-with-different-data-next-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434182%2fstargazer-r-display-mulitple-regression-with-different-data-next-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

Alexandru Averescu