“Criticism” vs. “critique”











up vote
14
down vote

favorite
3












What is the difference in meaning between criticism and critique?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Also on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique#Critique_vs_Criticism
    – Pacerier
    Mar 3 '16 at 5:07















up vote
14
down vote

favorite
3












What is the difference in meaning between criticism and critique?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Also on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique#Critique_vs_Criticism
    – Pacerier
    Mar 3 '16 at 5:07













up vote
14
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
14
down vote

favorite
3






3





What is the difference in meaning between criticism and critique?










share|improve this question















What is the difference in meaning between criticism and critique?







meaning differences nouns






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 27 '14 at 11:54









RegDwigнt

82.5k31281377




82.5k31281377










asked Apr 26 '14 at 15:42









Aschente

77126




77126








  • 1




    Also on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique#Critique_vs_Criticism
    – Pacerier
    Mar 3 '16 at 5:07














  • 1




    Also on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique#Critique_vs_Criticism
    – Pacerier
    Mar 3 '16 at 5:07








1




1




Also on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique#Critique_vs_Criticism
– Pacerier
Mar 3 '16 at 5:07




Also on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique#Critique_vs_Criticism
– Pacerier
Mar 3 '16 at 5:07










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
12
down vote



accepted










At bottom there is no difference.



The terms critic, criticize, criticism have always had a double sense in English. The base meaning is “pass judgment on”, but in popular use the words have usually meant “pass a negative judgment on”, while in academic and literary use they have tended in the opposite direction, signifying close and dispassionate analysis which may or may not issue in a formal judgment.



The French version critique was adopted into English primarily as a noun, meaning an instance of criticism, a critical essay or notice; in many cases there is no evident distinction between critic(k) and critique in this sense until the 19th century. Around 1960 academics began using critique in both nominal and verbal senses more and more frequently—at a guess, as a desperate effort to drive into thick undergraduate heads the fact that the critical endeavour in literature, art, history and philosophy is not simply a matter of expressing negative opinions.



If that was the intention, it failed. Today critique in popular use is just as likely to mean ‘censure’ as ‘analyze’.




“Maybe we should be that way about the first gentleman also and really critique the way they look all the time, their choice of tie, or their hair style or whatever, or maybe their weight.” —Former first lady Laura Bush on CSPAN, Jan 27 2014



Yes, to hell with all of these left communists making criticisms! For as we all know the left has never done anything worth of critique! —Comment on a book review on The North Star, Apr 5 2014



Funding freeze critiqued A UK science-advocacy group says that a repeated freeze to the government's £4.6-billion (US$7-billion) science-research budget, announced on 26 June, will damage early-career researchers' work and drive them to other nations. —Nature online, 2013







share|improve this answer























  • He asked for meaning, not an etymological discussion and faulty prose from people without the necessary esoteric logic to formulate coherent structure. "You have to understand that people that are hurting are going to criticize." George H. W. Bush, Former President (Giggle! It is fun to comment like that!)
    – Apple Freejeans
    Apr 26 '14 at 17:26








  • 1




    @APrejean I don't think you can characterize either Ms. Bush, an admirably articulate woman, or the editorial staff of one of the world's most prestigious academic journals, as lacking in logical discrimination. I have apparently not made myself clear: there are two meanings involved here, but they distinguish not two words, but the use of both words for different audiences.
    – StoneyB
    Apr 26 '14 at 17:52


















up vote
0
down vote













"Critique" is mainly used when literature or a work of art is concerned. "Criticism" is the general word.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I had a teacher for Equine and Animal science that was a real hard ass, but I loved her very much. She always said to people "I'm not criticizing you, I'm critiquing you"
    In other words she wasnt trying to hurt someone with everything they did wrong, she was pointing out specifically the things they needed to work on and how to do so. Even if it sounded harsh I believe critiquing always involves some sort of advice or reasoning to help a person grow from mistakes. While critics just say there opinion on how things are wrong. Whether it's what you say, do, how you write, think etc.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      up vote
      -2
      down vote













      http://scribesalley.blogspot.com/2008/08/difference-between-critique-and.html




      The Difference between Critique and Criticism



      Criticism finds fault/Critique looks at structure
      Criticism looks for what's lacking/Critique finds what's working
      Criticism condemns what it doesn't understand/Critique asks for clarification
      Criticism is spoken with a cruel wit and sarcastic tongue/Critique's voice is kind, honest, and objective
      Criticism is negative/Critique is positive (even about what isn't working)
      Criticism is vague and general/Critique is concrete and specific
      Criticism has no sense of humor/Critique insists on laughter, too
      Criticism looks for flaws in the writer as well as the writing/Critique addresses only what is on the page


      Taken from Writing Alone, Writing Together; A Guide for Writers and
      Writing Groups by Judy Reeves







      share|improve this answer

















      • 2




        This is an entirely idiolectal understanding of the terms which bears no relation to their actual use.
        – StoneyB
        Apr 26 '14 at 16:15










      • If you all are going to pout about the answer because it is a quote, that is fine. But Judy Reeves and her published work are quite accepted and accredited, and this was her guide to use, not meaning. Your fiction was stated quite pleasantly, though.
        – Apple Freejeans
        Apr 26 '14 at 16:52








      • 2




        I have no objections to quotations - I employ them myself. But Ms. Reeves describes herself as "writer, teacher, and writing practice provocateur", and I think this is one of her provocations, not serious criticism/critique.
        – StoneyB
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:27










      • @StoneyB Even with your mischaracterization of her work, by your own quote it was "writing practice provocateur". She did not outline the difference in meaning (which OP requested) for a philosophical soliloquy, but for other people to use in their writing. At worst, you disagree with her, but thumbing me down on a post that has EXACT application to the question posed was improper. I gave an appropriate source and was on-topic. The OP may not be better off for my post, but you cannot argue that he is worse off for it, either.
        – Apple Freejeans
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:34




















      up vote
      -2
      down vote













      criticize is like when u know your kids talk something bad about someone not exactly backbiting but like




      when he went to syria he saw people criticizing hazrat ali




      criticize is talking bad about someone you know i dont care if thats not the correct answer cause i am just typing like crazy



      critique means to censure/analyze






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        Your response would be more effective if you quoted and linked to third-party resources (such as dictionaries) that corroborate for the definitions you provide.
        – Sven Yargs
        Dec 30 '17 at 3:00











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f166404%2fcriticism-vs-critique%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      12
      down vote



      accepted










      At bottom there is no difference.



      The terms critic, criticize, criticism have always had a double sense in English. The base meaning is “pass judgment on”, but in popular use the words have usually meant “pass a negative judgment on”, while in academic and literary use they have tended in the opposite direction, signifying close and dispassionate analysis which may or may not issue in a formal judgment.



      The French version critique was adopted into English primarily as a noun, meaning an instance of criticism, a critical essay or notice; in many cases there is no evident distinction between critic(k) and critique in this sense until the 19th century. Around 1960 academics began using critique in both nominal and verbal senses more and more frequently—at a guess, as a desperate effort to drive into thick undergraduate heads the fact that the critical endeavour in literature, art, history and philosophy is not simply a matter of expressing negative opinions.



      If that was the intention, it failed. Today critique in popular use is just as likely to mean ‘censure’ as ‘analyze’.




      “Maybe we should be that way about the first gentleman also and really critique the way they look all the time, their choice of tie, or their hair style or whatever, or maybe their weight.” —Former first lady Laura Bush on CSPAN, Jan 27 2014



      Yes, to hell with all of these left communists making criticisms! For as we all know the left has never done anything worth of critique! —Comment on a book review on The North Star, Apr 5 2014



      Funding freeze critiqued A UK science-advocacy group says that a repeated freeze to the government's £4.6-billion (US$7-billion) science-research budget, announced on 26 June, will damage early-career researchers' work and drive them to other nations. —Nature online, 2013







      share|improve this answer























      • He asked for meaning, not an etymological discussion and faulty prose from people without the necessary esoteric logic to formulate coherent structure. "You have to understand that people that are hurting are going to criticize." George H. W. Bush, Former President (Giggle! It is fun to comment like that!)
        – Apple Freejeans
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:26








      • 1




        @APrejean I don't think you can characterize either Ms. Bush, an admirably articulate woman, or the editorial staff of one of the world's most prestigious academic journals, as lacking in logical discrimination. I have apparently not made myself clear: there are two meanings involved here, but they distinguish not two words, but the use of both words for different audiences.
        – StoneyB
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:52















      up vote
      12
      down vote



      accepted










      At bottom there is no difference.



      The terms critic, criticize, criticism have always had a double sense in English. The base meaning is “pass judgment on”, but in popular use the words have usually meant “pass a negative judgment on”, while in academic and literary use they have tended in the opposite direction, signifying close and dispassionate analysis which may or may not issue in a formal judgment.



      The French version critique was adopted into English primarily as a noun, meaning an instance of criticism, a critical essay or notice; in many cases there is no evident distinction between critic(k) and critique in this sense until the 19th century. Around 1960 academics began using critique in both nominal and verbal senses more and more frequently—at a guess, as a desperate effort to drive into thick undergraduate heads the fact that the critical endeavour in literature, art, history and philosophy is not simply a matter of expressing negative opinions.



      If that was the intention, it failed. Today critique in popular use is just as likely to mean ‘censure’ as ‘analyze’.




      “Maybe we should be that way about the first gentleman also and really critique the way they look all the time, their choice of tie, or their hair style or whatever, or maybe their weight.” —Former first lady Laura Bush on CSPAN, Jan 27 2014



      Yes, to hell with all of these left communists making criticisms! For as we all know the left has never done anything worth of critique! —Comment on a book review on The North Star, Apr 5 2014



      Funding freeze critiqued A UK science-advocacy group says that a repeated freeze to the government's £4.6-billion (US$7-billion) science-research budget, announced on 26 June, will damage early-career researchers' work and drive them to other nations. —Nature online, 2013







      share|improve this answer























      • He asked for meaning, not an etymological discussion and faulty prose from people without the necessary esoteric logic to formulate coherent structure. "You have to understand that people that are hurting are going to criticize." George H. W. Bush, Former President (Giggle! It is fun to comment like that!)
        – Apple Freejeans
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:26








      • 1




        @APrejean I don't think you can characterize either Ms. Bush, an admirably articulate woman, or the editorial staff of one of the world's most prestigious academic journals, as lacking in logical discrimination. I have apparently not made myself clear: there are two meanings involved here, but they distinguish not two words, but the use of both words for different audiences.
        – StoneyB
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:52













      up vote
      12
      down vote



      accepted







      up vote
      12
      down vote



      accepted






      At bottom there is no difference.



      The terms critic, criticize, criticism have always had a double sense in English. The base meaning is “pass judgment on”, but in popular use the words have usually meant “pass a negative judgment on”, while in academic and literary use they have tended in the opposite direction, signifying close and dispassionate analysis which may or may not issue in a formal judgment.



      The French version critique was adopted into English primarily as a noun, meaning an instance of criticism, a critical essay or notice; in many cases there is no evident distinction between critic(k) and critique in this sense until the 19th century. Around 1960 academics began using critique in both nominal and verbal senses more and more frequently—at a guess, as a desperate effort to drive into thick undergraduate heads the fact that the critical endeavour in literature, art, history and philosophy is not simply a matter of expressing negative opinions.



      If that was the intention, it failed. Today critique in popular use is just as likely to mean ‘censure’ as ‘analyze’.




      “Maybe we should be that way about the first gentleman also and really critique the way they look all the time, their choice of tie, or their hair style or whatever, or maybe their weight.” —Former first lady Laura Bush on CSPAN, Jan 27 2014



      Yes, to hell with all of these left communists making criticisms! For as we all know the left has never done anything worth of critique! —Comment on a book review on The North Star, Apr 5 2014



      Funding freeze critiqued A UK science-advocacy group says that a repeated freeze to the government's £4.6-billion (US$7-billion) science-research budget, announced on 26 June, will damage early-career researchers' work and drive them to other nations. —Nature online, 2013







      share|improve this answer














      At bottom there is no difference.



      The terms critic, criticize, criticism have always had a double sense in English. The base meaning is “pass judgment on”, but in popular use the words have usually meant “pass a negative judgment on”, while in academic and literary use they have tended in the opposite direction, signifying close and dispassionate analysis which may or may not issue in a formal judgment.



      The French version critique was adopted into English primarily as a noun, meaning an instance of criticism, a critical essay or notice; in many cases there is no evident distinction between critic(k) and critique in this sense until the 19th century. Around 1960 academics began using critique in both nominal and verbal senses more and more frequently—at a guess, as a desperate effort to drive into thick undergraduate heads the fact that the critical endeavour in literature, art, history and philosophy is not simply a matter of expressing negative opinions.



      If that was the intention, it failed. Today critique in popular use is just as likely to mean ‘censure’ as ‘analyze’.




      “Maybe we should be that way about the first gentleman also and really critique the way they look all the time, their choice of tie, or their hair style or whatever, or maybe their weight.” —Former first lady Laura Bush on CSPAN, Jan 27 2014



      Yes, to hell with all of these left communists making criticisms! For as we all know the left has never done anything worth of critique! —Comment on a book review on The North Star, Apr 5 2014



      Funding freeze critiqued A UK science-advocacy group says that a repeated freeze to the government's £4.6-billion (US$7-billion) science-research budget, announced on 26 June, will damage early-career researchers' work and drive them to other nations. —Nature online, 2013








      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 26 '14 at 18:26

























      answered Apr 26 '14 at 17:21









      StoneyB

      64.1k3110211




      64.1k3110211












      • He asked for meaning, not an etymological discussion and faulty prose from people without the necessary esoteric logic to formulate coherent structure. "You have to understand that people that are hurting are going to criticize." George H. W. Bush, Former President (Giggle! It is fun to comment like that!)
        – Apple Freejeans
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:26








      • 1




        @APrejean I don't think you can characterize either Ms. Bush, an admirably articulate woman, or the editorial staff of one of the world's most prestigious academic journals, as lacking in logical discrimination. I have apparently not made myself clear: there are two meanings involved here, but they distinguish not two words, but the use of both words for different audiences.
        – StoneyB
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:52


















      • He asked for meaning, not an etymological discussion and faulty prose from people without the necessary esoteric logic to formulate coherent structure. "You have to understand that people that are hurting are going to criticize." George H. W. Bush, Former President (Giggle! It is fun to comment like that!)
        – Apple Freejeans
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:26








      • 1




        @APrejean I don't think you can characterize either Ms. Bush, an admirably articulate woman, or the editorial staff of one of the world's most prestigious academic journals, as lacking in logical discrimination. I have apparently not made myself clear: there are two meanings involved here, but they distinguish not two words, but the use of both words for different audiences.
        – StoneyB
        Apr 26 '14 at 17:52
















      He asked for meaning, not an etymological discussion and faulty prose from people without the necessary esoteric logic to formulate coherent structure. "You have to understand that people that are hurting are going to criticize." George H. W. Bush, Former President (Giggle! It is fun to comment like that!)
      – Apple Freejeans
      Apr 26 '14 at 17:26






      He asked for meaning, not an etymological discussion and faulty prose from people without the necessary esoteric logic to formulate coherent structure. "You have to understand that people that are hurting are going to criticize." George H. W. Bush, Former President (Giggle! It is fun to comment like that!)
      – Apple Freejeans
      Apr 26 '14 at 17:26






      1




      1




      @APrejean I don't think you can characterize either Ms. Bush, an admirably articulate woman, or the editorial staff of one of the world's most prestigious academic journals, as lacking in logical discrimination. I have apparently not made myself clear: there are two meanings involved here, but they distinguish not two words, but the use of both words for different audiences.
      – StoneyB
      Apr 26 '14 at 17:52




      @APrejean I don't think you can characterize either Ms. Bush, an admirably articulate woman, or the editorial staff of one of the world's most prestigious academic journals, as lacking in logical discrimination. I have apparently not made myself clear: there are two meanings involved here, but they distinguish not two words, but the use of both words for different audiences.
      – StoneyB
      Apr 26 '14 at 17:52












      up vote
      0
      down vote













      "Critique" is mainly used when literature or a work of art is concerned. "Criticism" is the general word.






      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        "Critique" is mainly used when literature or a work of art is concerned. "Criticism" is the general word.






        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          "Critique" is mainly used when literature or a work of art is concerned. "Criticism" is the general word.






          share|improve this answer














          "Critique" is mainly used when literature or a work of art is concerned. "Criticism" is the general word.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 27 '14 at 11:54









          RegDwigнt

          82.5k31281377




          82.5k31281377










          answered Apr 26 '14 at 21:13









          rogermue

          11.7k41647




          11.7k41647






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              I had a teacher for Equine and Animal science that was a real hard ass, but I loved her very much. She always said to people "I'm not criticizing you, I'm critiquing you"
              In other words she wasnt trying to hurt someone with everything they did wrong, she was pointing out specifically the things they needed to work on and how to do so. Even if it sounded harsh I believe critiquing always involves some sort of advice or reasoning to help a person grow from mistakes. While critics just say there opinion on how things are wrong. Whether it's what you say, do, how you write, think etc.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                up vote
                0
                down vote













                I had a teacher for Equine and Animal science that was a real hard ass, but I loved her very much. She always said to people "I'm not criticizing you, I'm critiquing you"
                In other words she wasnt trying to hurt someone with everything they did wrong, she was pointing out specifically the things they needed to work on and how to do so. Even if it sounded harsh I believe critiquing always involves some sort of advice or reasoning to help a person grow from mistakes. While critics just say there opinion on how things are wrong. Whether it's what you say, do, how you write, think etc.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  I had a teacher for Equine and Animal science that was a real hard ass, but I loved her very much. She always said to people "I'm not criticizing you, I'm critiquing you"
                  In other words she wasnt trying to hurt someone with everything they did wrong, she was pointing out specifically the things they needed to work on and how to do so. Even if it sounded harsh I believe critiquing always involves some sort of advice or reasoning to help a person grow from mistakes. While critics just say there opinion on how things are wrong. Whether it's what you say, do, how you write, think etc.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  I had a teacher for Equine and Animal science that was a real hard ass, but I loved her very much. She always said to people "I'm not criticizing you, I'm critiquing you"
                  In other words she wasnt trying to hurt someone with everything they did wrong, she was pointing out specifically the things they needed to work on and how to do so. Even if it sounded harsh I believe critiquing always involves some sort of advice or reasoning to help a person grow from mistakes. While critics just say there opinion on how things are wrong. Whether it's what you say, do, how you write, think etc.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Shelby Breckenridge

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor




                  Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Shelby Breckenridge is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                      up vote
                      -2
                      down vote













                      http://scribesalley.blogspot.com/2008/08/difference-between-critique-and.html




                      The Difference between Critique and Criticism



                      Criticism finds fault/Critique looks at structure
                      Criticism looks for what's lacking/Critique finds what's working
                      Criticism condemns what it doesn't understand/Critique asks for clarification
                      Criticism is spoken with a cruel wit and sarcastic tongue/Critique's voice is kind, honest, and objective
                      Criticism is negative/Critique is positive (even about what isn't working)
                      Criticism is vague and general/Critique is concrete and specific
                      Criticism has no sense of humor/Critique insists on laughter, too
                      Criticism looks for flaws in the writer as well as the writing/Critique addresses only what is on the page


                      Taken from Writing Alone, Writing Together; A Guide for Writers and
                      Writing Groups by Judy Reeves







                      share|improve this answer

















                      • 2




                        This is an entirely idiolectal understanding of the terms which bears no relation to their actual use.
                        – StoneyB
                        Apr 26 '14 at 16:15










                      • If you all are going to pout about the answer because it is a quote, that is fine. But Judy Reeves and her published work are quite accepted and accredited, and this was her guide to use, not meaning. Your fiction was stated quite pleasantly, though.
                        – Apple Freejeans
                        Apr 26 '14 at 16:52








                      • 2




                        I have no objections to quotations - I employ them myself. But Ms. Reeves describes herself as "writer, teacher, and writing practice provocateur", and I think this is one of her provocations, not serious criticism/critique.
                        – StoneyB
                        Apr 26 '14 at 17:27










                      • @StoneyB Even with your mischaracterization of her work, by your own quote it was "writing practice provocateur". She did not outline the difference in meaning (which OP requested) for a philosophical soliloquy, but for other people to use in their writing. At worst, you disagree with her, but thumbing me down on a post that has EXACT application to the question posed was improper. I gave an appropriate source and was on-topic. The OP may not be better off for my post, but you cannot argue that he is worse off for it, either.
                        – Apple Freejeans
                        Apr 26 '14 at 17:34

















                      up vote
                      -2
                      down vote













                      http://scribesalley.blogspot.com/2008/08/difference-between-critique-and.html




                      The Difference between Critique and Criticism



                      Criticism finds fault/Critique looks at structure
                      Criticism looks for what's lacking/Critique finds what's working
                      Criticism condemns what it doesn't understand/Critique asks for clarification
                      Criticism is spoken with a cruel wit and sarcastic tongue/Critique's voice is kind, honest, and objective
                      Criticism is negative/Critique is positive (even about what isn't working)
                      Criticism is vague and general/Critique is concrete and specific
                      Criticism has no sense of humor/Critique insists on laughter, too
                      Criticism looks for flaws in the writer as well as the writing/Critique addresses only what is on the page


                      Taken from Writing Alone, Writing Together; A Guide for Writers and
                      Writing Groups by Judy Reeves







                      share|improve this answer

















                      • 2




                        This is an entirely idiolectal understanding of the terms which bears no relation to their actual use.
                        – StoneyB
                        Apr 26 '14 at 16:15










                      • If you all are going to pout about the answer because it is a quote, that is fine. But Judy Reeves and her published work are quite accepted and accredited, and this was her guide to use, not meaning. Your fiction was stated quite pleasantly, though.
                        – Apple Freejeans
                        Apr 26 '14 at 16:52








                      • 2




                        I have no objections to quotations - I employ them myself. But Ms. Reeves describes herself as "writer, teacher, and writing practice provocateur", and I think this is one of her provocations, not serious criticism/critique.
                        – StoneyB
                        Apr 26 '14 at 17:27










                      • @StoneyB Even with your mischaracterization of her work, by your own quote it was "writing practice provocateur". She did not outline the difference in meaning (which OP requested) for a philosophical soliloquy, but for other people to use in their writing. At worst, you disagree with her, but thumbing me down on a post that has EXACT application to the question posed was improper. I gave an appropriate source and was on-topic. The OP may not be better off for my post, but you cannot argue that he is worse off for it, either.
                        – Apple Freejeans
                        Apr 26 '14 at 17:34















                      up vote
                      -2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      -2
                      down vote









                      http://scribesalley.blogspot.com/2008/08/difference-between-critique-and.html




                      The Difference between Critique and Criticism



                      Criticism finds fault/Critique looks at structure
                      Criticism looks for what's lacking/Critique finds what's working
                      Criticism condemns what it doesn't understand/Critique asks for clarification
                      Criticism is spoken with a cruel wit and sarcastic tongue/Critique's voice is kind, honest, and objective
                      Criticism is negative/Critique is positive (even about what isn't working)
                      Criticism is vague and general/Critique is concrete and specific
                      Criticism has no sense of humor/Critique insists on laughter, too
                      Criticism looks for flaws in the writer as well as the writing/Critique addresses only what is on the page


                      Taken from Writing Alone, Writing Together; A Guide for Writers and
                      Writing Groups by Judy Reeves







                      share|improve this answer












                      http://scribesalley.blogspot.com/2008/08/difference-between-critique-and.html




                      The Difference between Critique and Criticism



                      Criticism finds fault/Critique looks at structure
                      Criticism looks for what's lacking/Critique finds what's working
                      Criticism condemns what it doesn't understand/Critique asks for clarification
                      Criticism is spoken with a cruel wit and sarcastic tongue/Critique's voice is kind, honest, and objective
                      Criticism is negative/Critique is positive (even about what isn't working)
                      Criticism is vague and general/Critique is concrete and specific
                      Criticism has no sense of humor/Critique insists on laughter, too
                      Criticism looks for flaws in the writer as well as the writing/Critique addresses only what is on the page


                      Taken from Writing Alone, Writing Together; A Guide for Writers and
                      Writing Groups by Judy Reeves








                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 26 '14 at 15:46









                      Apple Freejeans

                      51825




                      51825








                      • 2




                        This is an entirely idiolectal understanding of the terms which bears no relation to their actual use.
                        – StoneyB
                        Apr 26 '14 at 16:15










                      • If you all are going to pout about the answer because it is a quote, that is fine. But Judy Reeves and her published work are quite accepted and accredited, and this was her guide to use, not meaning. Your fiction was stated quite pleasantly, though.
                        – Apple Freejeans
                        Apr 26 '14 at 16:52








                      • 2




                        I have no objections to quotations - I employ them myself. But Ms. Reeves describes herself as "writer, teacher, and writing practice provocateur", and I think this is one of her provocations, not serious criticism/critique.
                        – StoneyB
                        Apr 26 '14 at 17:27










                      • @StoneyB Even with your mischaracterization of her work, by your own quote it was "writing practice provocateur". She did not outline the difference in meaning (which OP requested) for a philosophical soliloquy, but for other people to use in their writing. At worst, you disagree with her, but thumbing me down on a post that has EXACT application to the question posed was improper. I gave an appropriate source and was on-topic. The OP may not be better off for my post, but you cannot argue that he is worse off for it, either.
                        – Apple Freejeans
                        Apr 26 '14 at 17:34
















                      • 2




                        This is an entirely idiolectal understanding of the terms which bears no relation to their actual use.
                        – StoneyB
                        Apr 26 '14 at 16:15










                      • If you all are going to pout about the answer because it is a quote, that is fine. But Judy Reeves and her published work are quite accepted and accredited, and this was her guide to use, not meaning. Your fiction was stated quite pleasantly, though.
                        – Apple Freejeans
                        Apr 26 '14 at 16:52








                      • 2




                        I have no objections to quotations - I employ them myself. But Ms. Reeves describes herself as "writer, teacher, and writing practice provocateur", and I think this is one of her provocations, not serious criticism/critique.
                        – StoneyB
                        Apr 26 '14 at 17:27










                      • @StoneyB Even with your mischaracterization of her work, by your own quote it was "writing practice provocateur". She did not outline the difference in meaning (which OP requested) for a philosophical soliloquy, but for other people to use in their writing. At worst, you disagree with her, but thumbing me down on a post that has EXACT application to the question posed was improper. I gave an appropriate source and was on-topic. The OP may not be better off for my post, but you cannot argue that he is worse off for it, either.
                        – Apple Freejeans
                        Apr 26 '14 at 17:34










                      2




                      2




                      This is an entirely idiolectal understanding of the terms which bears no relation to their actual use.
                      – StoneyB
                      Apr 26 '14 at 16:15




                      This is an entirely idiolectal understanding of the terms which bears no relation to their actual use.
                      – StoneyB
                      Apr 26 '14 at 16:15












                      If you all are going to pout about the answer because it is a quote, that is fine. But Judy Reeves and her published work are quite accepted and accredited, and this was her guide to use, not meaning. Your fiction was stated quite pleasantly, though.
                      – Apple Freejeans
                      Apr 26 '14 at 16:52






                      If you all are going to pout about the answer because it is a quote, that is fine. But Judy Reeves and her published work are quite accepted and accredited, and this was her guide to use, not meaning. Your fiction was stated quite pleasantly, though.
                      – Apple Freejeans
                      Apr 26 '14 at 16:52






                      2




                      2




                      I have no objections to quotations - I employ them myself. But Ms. Reeves describes herself as "writer, teacher, and writing practice provocateur", and I think this is one of her provocations, not serious criticism/critique.
                      – StoneyB
                      Apr 26 '14 at 17:27




                      I have no objections to quotations - I employ them myself. But Ms. Reeves describes herself as "writer, teacher, and writing practice provocateur", and I think this is one of her provocations, not serious criticism/critique.
                      – StoneyB
                      Apr 26 '14 at 17:27












                      @StoneyB Even with your mischaracterization of her work, by your own quote it was "writing practice provocateur". She did not outline the difference in meaning (which OP requested) for a philosophical soliloquy, but for other people to use in their writing. At worst, you disagree with her, but thumbing me down on a post that has EXACT application to the question posed was improper. I gave an appropriate source and was on-topic. The OP may not be better off for my post, but you cannot argue that he is worse off for it, either.
                      – Apple Freejeans
                      Apr 26 '14 at 17:34






                      @StoneyB Even with your mischaracterization of her work, by your own quote it was "writing practice provocateur". She did not outline the difference in meaning (which OP requested) for a philosophical soliloquy, but for other people to use in their writing. At worst, you disagree with her, but thumbing me down on a post that has EXACT application to the question posed was improper. I gave an appropriate source and was on-topic. The OP may not be better off for my post, but you cannot argue that he is worse off for it, either.
                      – Apple Freejeans
                      Apr 26 '14 at 17:34












                      up vote
                      -2
                      down vote













                      criticize is like when u know your kids talk something bad about someone not exactly backbiting but like




                      when he went to syria he saw people criticizing hazrat ali




                      criticize is talking bad about someone you know i dont care if thats not the correct answer cause i am just typing like crazy



                      critique means to censure/analyze






                      share|improve this answer

















                      • 1




                        Your response would be more effective if you quoted and linked to third-party resources (such as dictionaries) that corroborate for the definitions you provide.
                        – Sven Yargs
                        Dec 30 '17 at 3:00















                      up vote
                      -2
                      down vote













                      criticize is like when u know your kids talk something bad about someone not exactly backbiting but like




                      when he went to syria he saw people criticizing hazrat ali




                      criticize is talking bad about someone you know i dont care if thats not the correct answer cause i am just typing like crazy



                      critique means to censure/analyze






                      share|improve this answer

















                      • 1




                        Your response would be more effective if you quoted and linked to third-party resources (such as dictionaries) that corroborate for the definitions you provide.
                        – Sven Yargs
                        Dec 30 '17 at 3:00













                      up vote
                      -2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      -2
                      down vote









                      criticize is like when u know your kids talk something bad about someone not exactly backbiting but like




                      when he went to syria he saw people criticizing hazrat ali




                      criticize is talking bad about someone you know i dont care if thats not the correct answer cause i am just typing like crazy



                      critique means to censure/analyze






                      share|improve this answer












                      criticize is like when u know your kids talk something bad about someone not exactly backbiting but like




                      when he went to syria he saw people criticizing hazrat ali




                      criticize is talking bad about someone you know i dont care if thats not the correct answer cause i am just typing like crazy



                      critique means to censure/analyze







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 30 '17 at 1:57









                      Allahisgreat22

                      1




                      1








                      • 1




                        Your response would be more effective if you quoted and linked to third-party resources (such as dictionaries) that corroborate for the definitions you provide.
                        – Sven Yargs
                        Dec 30 '17 at 3:00














                      • 1




                        Your response would be more effective if you quoted and linked to third-party resources (such as dictionaries) that corroborate for the definitions you provide.
                        – Sven Yargs
                        Dec 30 '17 at 3:00








                      1




                      1




                      Your response would be more effective if you quoted and linked to third-party resources (such as dictionaries) that corroborate for the definitions you provide.
                      – Sven Yargs
                      Dec 30 '17 at 3:00




                      Your response would be more effective if you quoted and linked to third-party resources (such as dictionaries) that corroborate for the definitions you provide.
                      – Sven Yargs
                      Dec 30 '17 at 3:00


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f166404%2fcriticism-vs-critique%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

                      How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

                      Alexandru Averescu