Can present tense be used without an adverb like “usually” or “always” when describing a habit?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I understand we use the present tense when we describe habits.



"My dog always sleeps under the bed."

"It usually sits on the sofa."



Does it make sense if I leave 'always' and 'usually' out? as in the sentences below, without any background information?



"My dog sleeps under the bed."

"It sits on the sofa."



Are they complete sentences? or grammatically correct?










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 43 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 4




    The adverbs are not required.
    – KarlG
    Mar 13 at 14:25






  • 1




    Yes. This is the principal use of the present tense with active verbs. The real present time is referred to by the present progressive: My dog is sleeping under the bed.
    – John Lawler
    Mar 13 at 15:48










  • THANKS guys! So it’s not always necessary to add “adverbs” to a sentence with simple present tense? How about “My dog swims. It swims well.” Does this make sense? It seems like something is missing. Should I say “My dog can swim. It can swim well” instead?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 0:18

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I understand we use the present tense when we describe habits.



"My dog always sleeps under the bed."

"It usually sits on the sofa."



Does it make sense if I leave 'always' and 'usually' out? as in the sentences below, without any background information?



"My dog sleeps under the bed."

"It sits on the sofa."



Are they complete sentences? or grammatically correct?










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 43 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 4




    The adverbs are not required.
    – KarlG
    Mar 13 at 14:25






  • 1




    Yes. This is the principal use of the present tense with active verbs. The real present time is referred to by the present progressive: My dog is sleeping under the bed.
    – John Lawler
    Mar 13 at 15:48










  • THANKS guys! So it’s not always necessary to add “adverbs” to a sentence with simple present tense? How about “My dog swims. It swims well.” Does this make sense? It seems like something is missing. Should I say “My dog can swim. It can swim well” instead?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 0:18















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I understand we use the present tense when we describe habits.



"My dog always sleeps under the bed."

"It usually sits on the sofa."



Does it make sense if I leave 'always' and 'usually' out? as in the sentences below, without any background information?



"My dog sleeps under the bed."

"It sits on the sofa."



Are they complete sentences? or grammatically correct?










share|improve this question















I understand we use the present tense when we describe habits.



"My dog always sleeps under the bed."

"It usually sits on the sofa."



Does it make sense if I leave 'always' and 'usually' out? as in the sentences below, without any background information?



"My dog sleeps under the bed."

"It sits on the sofa."



Are they complete sentences? or grammatically correct?







grammar tenses adverbs sentence-structure present-tense






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 10 at 0:35









Laurel

29.4k655104




29.4k655104










asked Mar 13 at 14:14







user286503












bumped to the homepage by Community 43 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 43 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 4




    The adverbs are not required.
    – KarlG
    Mar 13 at 14:25






  • 1




    Yes. This is the principal use of the present tense with active verbs. The real present time is referred to by the present progressive: My dog is sleeping under the bed.
    – John Lawler
    Mar 13 at 15:48










  • THANKS guys! So it’s not always necessary to add “adverbs” to a sentence with simple present tense? How about “My dog swims. It swims well.” Does this make sense? It seems like something is missing. Should I say “My dog can swim. It can swim well” instead?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 0:18
















  • 4




    The adverbs are not required.
    – KarlG
    Mar 13 at 14:25






  • 1




    Yes. This is the principal use of the present tense with active verbs. The real present time is referred to by the present progressive: My dog is sleeping under the bed.
    – John Lawler
    Mar 13 at 15:48










  • THANKS guys! So it’s not always necessary to add “adverbs” to a sentence with simple present tense? How about “My dog swims. It swims well.” Does this make sense? It seems like something is missing. Should I say “My dog can swim. It can swim well” instead?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 0:18










4




4




The adverbs are not required.
– KarlG
Mar 13 at 14:25




The adverbs are not required.
– KarlG
Mar 13 at 14:25




1




1




Yes. This is the principal use of the present tense with active verbs. The real present time is referred to by the present progressive: My dog is sleeping under the bed.
– John Lawler
Mar 13 at 15:48




Yes. This is the principal use of the present tense with active verbs. The real present time is referred to by the present progressive: My dog is sleeping under the bed.
– John Lawler
Mar 13 at 15:48












THANKS guys! So it’s not always necessary to add “adverbs” to a sentence with simple present tense? How about “My dog swims. It swims well.” Does this make sense? It seems like something is missing. Should I say “My dog can swim. It can swim well” instead?
– user286503
Mar 14 at 0:18






THANKS guys! So it’s not always necessary to add “adverbs” to a sentence with simple present tense? How about “My dog swims. It swims well.” Does this make sense? It seems like something is missing. Should I say “My dog can swim. It can swim well” instead?
– user286503
Mar 14 at 0:18












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote














My dog always sleeps under the bed




and




My dog sleeps under the bed




both convey the notion in both being that your dog habitually sleeps under the bed.

If you intend to completely precise, and your dog occasionally sleeps somewhere other than under the bed, then




My dog sleeps under the bed




will be more appropriate.




It usually sits on the sofa




is fine. There is an excellent chance the dog sits somewhere other than on the sofa.




It sits on the sofa




is also OK As far a grammar goes, both example sentences are fine. The adverbs would serve to create a fine, exact meaning. If that is desired, the adverbs should be used.






share|improve this answer





















  • If I want to be more specific and clear about how often my dogs does that, then I'd use 'always', 'usually', 'sometimes'. But, without "the adverbs of frequency", the sentence itself totally makes sense. Am I right?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 1:06










  • Yes, of course. The adverbs add only specific meaning.
    – J. Taylor
    Mar 14 at 1:13










  • Does it apply to other verbs? For example, "My dog (often) touches my feet." I think it sounds OK without 'often'. How about "My dog swims fast." It doesn't sound right. I feel like, I need to say "My dog can swim fast." instead. But does "My dog swims fast" still make sense? is it a grammatically correct sentence?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 2:16












  • Everything you've mentioned is fine as to gram,mar
    – J. Taylor
    Mar 14 at 8:37


















up vote
0
down vote













Yes. Complete, grammatically correct sentence. Basic SVO structure with dependent clauses (led by prepositions "under" and "on"). Can come across as awkward in some contexts, but is actually a common construction. Listen carefully in conversation and you'll hear it.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f435217%2fcan-present-tense-be-used-without-an-adverb-like-usually-or-always-when-desc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown
























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote














    My dog always sleeps under the bed




    and




    My dog sleeps under the bed




    both convey the notion in both being that your dog habitually sleeps under the bed.

    If you intend to completely precise, and your dog occasionally sleeps somewhere other than under the bed, then




    My dog sleeps under the bed




    will be more appropriate.




    It usually sits on the sofa




    is fine. There is an excellent chance the dog sits somewhere other than on the sofa.




    It sits on the sofa




    is also OK As far a grammar goes, both example sentences are fine. The adverbs would serve to create a fine, exact meaning. If that is desired, the adverbs should be used.






    share|improve this answer





















    • If I want to be more specific and clear about how often my dogs does that, then I'd use 'always', 'usually', 'sometimes'. But, without "the adverbs of frequency", the sentence itself totally makes sense. Am I right?
      – user286503
      Mar 14 at 1:06










    • Yes, of course. The adverbs add only specific meaning.
      – J. Taylor
      Mar 14 at 1:13










    • Does it apply to other verbs? For example, "My dog (often) touches my feet." I think it sounds OK without 'often'. How about "My dog swims fast." It doesn't sound right. I feel like, I need to say "My dog can swim fast." instead. But does "My dog swims fast" still make sense? is it a grammatically correct sentence?
      – user286503
      Mar 14 at 2:16












    • Everything you've mentioned is fine as to gram,mar
      – J. Taylor
      Mar 14 at 8:37















    up vote
    0
    down vote














    My dog always sleeps under the bed




    and




    My dog sleeps under the bed




    both convey the notion in both being that your dog habitually sleeps under the bed.

    If you intend to completely precise, and your dog occasionally sleeps somewhere other than under the bed, then




    My dog sleeps under the bed




    will be more appropriate.




    It usually sits on the sofa




    is fine. There is an excellent chance the dog sits somewhere other than on the sofa.




    It sits on the sofa




    is also OK As far a grammar goes, both example sentences are fine. The adverbs would serve to create a fine, exact meaning. If that is desired, the adverbs should be used.






    share|improve this answer





















    • If I want to be more specific and clear about how often my dogs does that, then I'd use 'always', 'usually', 'sometimes'. But, without "the adverbs of frequency", the sentence itself totally makes sense. Am I right?
      – user286503
      Mar 14 at 1:06










    • Yes, of course. The adverbs add only specific meaning.
      – J. Taylor
      Mar 14 at 1:13










    • Does it apply to other verbs? For example, "My dog (often) touches my feet." I think it sounds OK without 'often'. How about "My dog swims fast." It doesn't sound right. I feel like, I need to say "My dog can swim fast." instead. But does "My dog swims fast" still make sense? is it a grammatically correct sentence?
      – user286503
      Mar 14 at 2:16












    • Everything you've mentioned is fine as to gram,mar
      – J. Taylor
      Mar 14 at 8:37













    up vote
    0
    down vote










    up vote
    0
    down vote










    My dog always sleeps under the bed




    and




    My dog sleeps under the bed




    both convey the notion in both being that your dog habitually sleeps under the bed.

    If you intend to completely precise, and your dog occasionally sleeps somewhere other than under the bed, then




    My dog sleeps under the bed




    will be more appropriate.




    It usually sits on the sofa




    is fine. There is an excellent chance the dog sits somewhere other than on the sofa.




    It sits on the sofa




    is also OK As far a grammar goes, both example sentences are fine. The adverbs would serve to create a fine, exact meaning. If that is desired, the adverbs should be used.






    share|improve this answer













    My dog always sleeps under the bed




    and




    My dog sleeps under the bed




    both convey the notion in both being that your dog habitually sleeps under the bed.

    If you intend to completely precise, and your dog occasionally sleeps somewhere other than under the bed, then




    My dog sleeps under the bed




    will be more appropriate.




    It usually sits on the sofa




    is fine. There is an excellent chance the dog sits somewhere other than on the sofa.




    It sits on the sofa




    is also OK As far a grammar goes, both example sentences are fine. The adverbs would serve to create a fine, exact meaning. If that is desired, the adverbs should be used.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 13 at 15:49









    J. Taylor

    4,10531224




    4,10531224












    • If I want to be more specific and clear about how often my dogs does that, then I'd use 'always', 'usually', 'sometimes'. But, without "the adverbs of frequency", the sentence itself totally makes sense. Am I right?
      – user286503
      Mar 14 at 1:06










    • Yes, of course. The adverbs add only specific meaning.
      – J. Taylor
      Mar 14 at 1:13










    • Does it apply to other verbs? For example, "My dog (often) touches my feet." I think it sounds OK without 'often'. How about "My dog swims fast." It doesn't sound right. I feel like, I need to say "My dog can swim fast." instead. But does "My dog swims fast" still make sense? is it a grammatically correct sentence?
      – user286503
      Mar 14 at 2:16












    • Everything you've mentioned is fine as to gram,mar
      – J. Taylor
      Mar 14 at 8:37


















    • If I want to be more specific and clear about how often my dogs does that, then I'd use 'always', 'usually', 'sometimes'. But, without "the adverbs of frequency", the sentence itself totally makes sense. Am I right?
      – user286503
      Mar 14 at 1:06










    • Yes, of course. The adverbs add only specific meaning.
      – J. Taylor
      Mar 14 at 1:13










    • Does it apply to other verbs? For example, "My dog (often) touches my feet." I think it sounds OK without 'often'. How about "My dog swims fast." It doesn't sound right. I feel like, I need to say "My dog can swim fast." instead. But does "My dog swims fast" still make sense? is it a grammatically correct sentence?
      – user286503
      Mar 14 at 2:16












    • Everything you've mentioned is fine as to gram,mar
      – J. Taylor
      Mar 14 at 8:37
















    If I want to be more specific and clear about how often my dogs does that, then I'd use 'always', 'usually', 'sometimes'. But, without "the adverbs of frequency", the sentence itself totally makes sense. Am I right?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 1:06




    If I want to be more specific and clear about how often my dogs does that, then I'd use 'always', 'usually', 'sometimes'. But, without "the adverbs of frequency", the sentence itself totally makes sense. Am I right?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 1:06












    Yes, of course. The adverbs add only specific meaning.
    – J. Taylor
    Mar 14 at 1:13




    Yes, of course. The adverbs add only specific meaning.
    – J. Taylor
    Mar 14 at 1:13












    Does it apply to other verbs? For example, "My dog (often) touches my feet." I think it sounds OK without 'often'. How about "My dog swims fast." It doesn't sound right. I feel like, I need to say "My dog can swim fast." instead. But does "My dog swims fast" still make sense? is it a grammatically correct sentence?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 2:16






    Does it apply to other verbs? For example, "My dog (often) touches my feet." I think it sounds OK without 'often'. How about "My dog swims fast." It doesn't sound right. I feel like, I need to say "My dog can swim fast." instead. But does "My dog swims fast" still make sense? is it a grammatically correct sentence?
    – user286503
    Mar 14 at 2:16














    Everything you've mentioned is fine as to gram,mar
    – J. Taylor
    Mar 14 at 8:37




    Everything you've mentioned is fine as to gram,mar
    – J. Taylor
    Mar 14 at 8:37












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Yes. Complete, grammatically correct sentence. Basic SVO structure with dependent clauses (led by prepositions "under" and "on"). Can come across as awkward in some contexts, but is actually a common construction. Listen carefully in conversation and you'll hear it.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Yes. Complete, grammatically correct sentence. Basic SVO structure with dependent clauses (led by prepositions "under" and "on"). Can come across as awkward in some contexts, but is actually a common construction. Listen carefully in conversation and you'll hear it.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Yes. Complete, grammatically correct sentence. Basic SVO structure with dependent clauses (led by prepositions "under" and "on"). Can come across as awkward in some contexts, but is actually a common construction. Listen carefully in conversation and you'll hear it.






        share|improve this answer












        Yes. Complete, grammatically correct sentence. Basic SVO structure with dependent clauses (led by prepositions "under" and "on"). Can come across as awkward in some contexts, but is actually a common construction. Listen carefully in conversation and you'll hear it.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Oct 10 at 23:11









        Carly

        1,491213




        1,491213






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f435217%2fcan-present-tense-be-used-without-an-adverb-like-usually-or-always-when-desc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

            Alexandru Averescu

            Trompette piccolo