Drawing a circle through 3 non-collinear points
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
Does circle through works with 3 points:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I want to draw a circle through A,B and C.
tikz-pgf
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
Does circle through works with 3 points:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I want to draw a circle through A,B and C.
tikz-pgf
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
Does circle through works with 3 points:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I want to draw a circle through A,B and C.
tikz-pgf
Does circle through works with 3 points:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I want to draw a circle through A,B and C.
tikz-pgf
tikz-pgf
edited Nov 21 at 19:48
Artificial Stupidity
4,8711833
4,8711833
asked Nov 21 at 17:02
lucky1928
1,0871716
1,0871716
add a comment |
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
The tkz-euclide
package has a macro to do this. The manual is written in French.
- First, we define the circle with the macro
tkzDefCircle
. - This macro returns two values that are the center recovered with the macro
tkzGetPoint{O}
- and the radius that is recovered with the macro
tkzGetLength{rayon}
.
Once this is done, we draw the circle with the macro tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
%usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
% node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
tkzDefCircle[circum](A,B,C)
tkzGetPoint{O} tkzGetLength{rayon}
tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
A new node style, based on the derivation below plus the information that one can use intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
, which I learned from AndréC's nice answer
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in },
at={(p5)},
circle through= {(#1)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C},draw=blue]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Just for fun: an analytic solution based on calc
only. (My personal opinion, though, is that this method is more "TikZy", i.e. closer to how the standard TikZ styles work, than the tkz-euclide macros, which are more like pstricks, which I have left behind. However, this is just a personal opinion, and might not be shared by others.)
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Note that n1
is a fraction, and could in principle not be well defined. If you ever encounter this case, just change the ordering, e.g. do draw[circle through 3 points={B}{C}{A}];
or something along those lines.)
ADDENDUM: Explanation of the analytic formula.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
path[use as bounding box] (-1,-4) rectangle (6,4);
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
ifnumX=1
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (start) at (2.5,0){Starting point: 3 points.};
foreach Y in {A,B,C}
{draw[-latex] (start) to[out=90,in=-90] (Y) node[above=2pt]{Y}; }
fi
ifnumX=2
coordinate (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $) coordinate(aux1);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) coordinate(aux2) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
where the lines that run through and are orthogonal to the edges intersect.};
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=45,in=-90] (aux1);
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=135,in=-90] (aux2);
fi
ifnumX=3
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){Call the points in the
middle $P_2$ and $P_4$, and the differences $P_1=A-B$ and $P_3=B-C$. Then the
orthogonal lines will fulfill
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_2+alpha,y_1\
y_2-alpha,x_1\
end{array}right) ]
and
[gamma_2(beta)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_4+beta,y_3\
y_4-beta,x_3\
end{array}right);. ]
};
fi
ifnumX=4
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
then simply determined by
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~gamma_2(beta);, ]
which has the solution
[
alpha~=~frac{-(x_2cdot x_3) + x_3cdot x_4 + y_3cdot (y_4-y_2 )}{x_3cdot y_1 - x_1cdot y_3};.
]
This is texttt{textbackslash n1} in the Tiemph{k}Z style texttt{circle through 3 points}.
};
fi
ifnumX=5
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,-0.1){Once we have the center,
determining the radius (texttt{textbackslash n2}) is trivial, and we can draw
the circle with a simple texttt{insert path}.};
fi
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
(+1) Give the analytical expression also, if possible :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:16
@nidhin It is in the code, isn't it?
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:20
Yes it is there. I meant outside the code. Mathematical expression.
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:25
@nidhin Done. There is a simple animation that you can create withconvert -delay 800 -loop 0 -density 300 -alpha remove <pdf> <gif>
, wherepdf
is the pdf file that gets created if you compile the lower code, andgif
the name of the animated gif you will create.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:54
Wow. That was more than expected. :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 20:03
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
You can use tkz-euclide
like this:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
tkzCircumCenter(A,B,C)tkzGetPoint{O}
tkzDrawCircle(O,A)
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Modified from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/16024/8650)
If you chose to use tkz-euclide
, then you should consider to do all of your drawing with it - depending on what it is - you can e.g. define your points with tkzDefPoint(x,y)
.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just for comparison purpose.
documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-eucl}
begin{document}
foreach i in {1.0,1.2,...,4.0}{
begin{pspicture}(-5,-5)(5,5)
pstTriangle(4;30){A}(4;90){B}(i;-45){C}
pstCircleABC{A}{B}{C}{O}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The code
node [draw] at (1,1) [circle through={(A)}] {};
draw a circle whose center is at (1,1)
and passes through A
. In this case the center of the Circumscribed circle has to be calculated before using through
.
I just used the Straightedge and compass construction to calculate the center and then drew circle. The basic idea is that all the perpendicular bisectors of the edges of a triangle meet at the same point: the circumcenter.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{through,intersections}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
path[name path=c1] (A) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c2] (B) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c3] (C) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name intersections={of = c1 and c2}];
path[name path=o1] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = c2 and c3}];
path[name path=o2] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = o1 and o2}];
node[draw,line width=2pt] at (intersection-1) [circle through={(A)}]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Just for fun, another solution inspired by the @marmot solution that calculates the intersection of two defined perpendicular bisector with the calc
library.
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in
node at (p5) [draw,line width=2pt,circle through= {(#1)}]{}}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Nice! I didn't know that one could usep1
etc. inintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
. (I guess it will be more elegant if you manage to eliminatedraw,line width=2pt,
from the node sincepath[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
also draws the path, which is not whatpath
usually does.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 21:11
@marmot It is simple to deleteline width=2pt
which is a given parameter of the lucky1928 question. On the other hand, it is more difficult to deletedraw
. To do that, you have to find a way to pass the parameters to the node, I'll get down to work and explore (finally!) thekey handlers
. I just saw that you succeeded! Congratulations!
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 21:56
I really could only do that after I learned theintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
thing from you, which is much better than the analytic computation of the intersection point, and presumably also more stable (even though the analytic derivation was fun ;-). Thanks a lot! (My aim was to create a style that behaves the same way ascircle through
, which your observation made possible, so thanks again!)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:03
@marmot Thank you very much and I have to return the compliment because it is by adapting your solution that I learned how to useinsert path
and that I am finally motivated to learnkey handlers
.
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 22:07
I really like that you acknowledge other posts (and I try to do the same). I wish all users would do that.... ;-)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:11
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Just for fun with @AndréC's answer:
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw let p1=($(A)!0.5!(B)$),
p2=($(A)!0.5!(C)$),
p3=($(p1)!2!-90:(B)$),
p4=($(p1)!2!90:(B)$),
p5=($(p2)!2!-90:(C)$),
p6=($(p2)!2!90:(C)$),
p7=(intersection of p3--p4 and p5--p6)
in
(A) -- (B)
(A) -- (C)
(p3) -- (p4)
(p5) -- (p6)
foreach j in {1,...,7} {
node[circle,minimum size=2pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=j] at(pj) {}
}
node[draw,line width=1pt,circle through= {(A)}] at (p7) {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=5pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=i] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
The tkz-euclide
package has a macro to do this. The manual is written in French.
- First, we define the circle with the macro
tkzDefCircle
. - This macro returns two values that are the center recovered with the macro
tkzGetPoint{O}
- and the radius that is recovered with the macro
tkzGetLength{rayon}
.
Once this is done, we draw the circle with the macro tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
%usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
% node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
tkzDefCircle[circum](A,B,C)
tkzGetPoint{O} tkzGetLength{rayon}
tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
The tkz-euclide
package has a macro to do this. The manual is written in French.
- First, we define the circle with the macro
tkzDefCircle
. - This macro returns two values that are the center recovered with the macro
tkzGetPoint{O}
- and the radius that is recovered with the macro
tkzGetLength{rayon}
.
Once this is done, we draw the circle with the macro tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
%usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
% node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
tkzDefCircle[circum](A,B,C)
tkzGetPoint{O} tkzGetLength{rayon}
tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
The tkz-euclide
package has a macro to do this. The manual is written in French.
- First, we define the circle with the macro
tkzDefCircle
. - This macro returns two values that are the center recovered with the macro
tkzGetPoint{O}
- and the radius that is recovered with the macro
tkzGetLength{rayon}
.
Once this is done, we draw the circle with the macro tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
%usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
% node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
tkzDefCircle[circum](A,B,C)
tkzGetPoint{O} tkzGetLength{rayon}
tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
The tkz-euclide
package has a macro to do this. The manual is written in French.
- First, we define the circle with the macro
tkzDefCircle
. - This macro returns two values that are the center recovered with the macro
tkzGetPoint{O}
- and the radius that is recovered with the macro
tkzGetLength{rayon}
.
Once this is done, we draw the circle with the macro tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
%usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
% node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
tkzDefCircle[circum](A,B,C)
tkzGetPoint{O} tkzGetLength{rayon}
tkzDrawCircle[R](O,rayon pt)
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered Nov 21 at 17:41
AndréC
6,24711140
6,24711140
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
A new node style, based on the derivation below plus the information that one can use intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
, which I learned from AndréC's nice answer
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in },
at={(p5)},
circle through= {(#1)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C},draw=blue]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Just for fun: an analytic solution based on calc
only. (My personal opinion, though, is that this method is more "TikZy", i.e. closer to how the standard TikZ styles work, than the tkz-euclide macros, which are more like pstricks, which I have left behind. However, this is just a personal opinion, and might not be shared by others.)
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Note that n1
is a fraction, and could in principle not be well defined. If you ever encounter this case, just change the ordering, e.g. do draw[circle through 3 points={B}{C}{A}];
or something along those lines.)
ADDENDUM: Explanation of the analytic formula.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
path[use as bounding box] (-1,-4) rectangle (6,4);
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
ifnumX=1
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (start) at (2.5,0){Starting point: 3 points.};
foreach Y in {A,B,C}
{draw[-latex] (start) to[out=90,in=-90] (Y) node[above=2pt]{Y}; }
fi
ifnumX=2
coordinate (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $) coordinate(aux1);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) coordinate(aux2) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
where the lines that run through and are orthogonal to the edges intersect.};
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=45,in=-90] (aux1);
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=135,in=-90] (aux2);
fi
ifnumX=3
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){Call the points in the
middle $P_2$ and $P_4$, and the differences $P_1=A-B$ and $P_3=B-C$. Then the
orthogonal lines will fulfill
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_2+alpha,y_1\
y_2-alpha,x_1\
end{array}right) ]
and
[gamma_2(beta)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_4+beta,y_3\
y_4-beta,x_3\
end{array}right);. ]
};
fi
ifnumX=4
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
then simply determined by
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~gamma_2(beta);, ]
which has the solution
[
alpha~=~frac{-(x_2cdot x_3) + x_3cdot x_4 + y_3cdot (y_4-y_2 )}{x_3cdot y_1 - x_1cdot y_3};.
]
This is texttt{textbackslash n1} in the Tiemph{k}Z style texttt{circle through 3 points}.
};
fi
ifnumX=5
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,-0.1){Once we have the center,
determining the radius (texttt{textbackslash n2}) is trivial, and we can draw
the circle with a simple texttt{insert path}.};
fi
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
(+1) Give the analytical expression also, if possible :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:16
@nidhin It is in the code, isn't it?
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:20
Yes it is there. I meant outside the code. Mathematical expression.
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:25
@nidhin Done. There is a simple animation that you can create withconvert -delay 800 -loop 0 -density 300 -alpha remove <pdf> <gif>
, wherepdf
is the pdf file that gets created if you compile the lower code, andgif
the name of the animated gif you will create.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:54
Wow. That was more than expected. :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 20:03
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
A new node style, based on the derivation below plus the information that one can use intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
, which I learned from AndréC's nice answer
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in },
at={(p5)},
circle through= {(#1)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C},draw=blue]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Just for fun: an analytic solution based on calc
only. (My personal opinion, though, is that this method is more "TikZy", i.e. closer to how the standard TikZ styles work, than the tkz-euclide macros, which are more like pstricks, which I have left behind. However, this is just a personal opinion, and might not be shared by others.)
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Note that n1
is a fraction, and could in principle not be well defined. If you ever encounter this case, just change the ordering, e.g. do draw[circle through 3 points={B}{C}{A}];
or something along those lines.)
ADDENDUM: Explanation of the analytic formula.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
path[use as bounding box] (-1,-4) rectangle (6,4);
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
ifnumX=1
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (start) at (2.5,0){Starting point: 3 points.};
foreach Y in {A,B,C}
{draw[-latex] (start) to[out=90,in=-90] (Y) node[above=2pt]{Y}; }
fi
ifnumX=2
coordinate (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $) coordinate(aux1);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) coordinate(aux2) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
where the lines that run through and are orthogonal to the edges intersect.};
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=45,in=-90] (aux1);
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=135,in=-90] (aux2);
fi
ifnumX=3
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){Call the points in the
middle $P_2$ and $P_4$, and the differences $P_1=A-B$ and $P_3=B-C$. Then the
orthogonal lines will fulfill
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_2+alpha,y_1\
y_2-alpha,x_1\
end{array}right) ]
and
[gamma_2(beta)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_4+beta,y_3\
y_4-beta,x_3\
end{array}right);. ]
};
fi
ifnumX=4
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
then simply determined by
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~gamma_2(beta);, ]
which has the solution
[
alpha~=~frac{-(x_2cdot x_3) + x_3cdot x_4 + y_3cdot (y_4-y_2 )}{x_3cdot y_1 - x_1cdot y_3};.
]
This is texttt{textbackslash n1} in the Tiemph{k}Z style texttt{circle through 3 points}.
};
fi
ifnumX=5
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,-0.1){Once we have the center,
determining the radius (texttt{textbackslash n2}) is trivial, and we can draw
the circle with a simple texttt{insert path}.};
fi
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
(+1) Give the analytical expression also, if possible :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:16
@nidhin It is in the code, isn't it?
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:20
Yes it is there. I meant outside the code. Mathematical expression.
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:25
@nidhin Done. There is a simple animation that you can create withconvert -delay 800 -loop 0 -density 300 -alpha remove <pdf> <gif>
, wherepdf
is the pdf file that gets created if you compile the lower code, andgif
the name of the animated gif you will create.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:54
Wow. That was more than expected. :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 20:03
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
A new node style, based on the derivation below plus the information that one can use intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
, which I learned from AndréC's nice answer
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in },
at={(p5)},
circle through= {(#1)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C},draw=blue]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Just for fun: an analytic solution based on calc
only. (My personal opinion, though, is that this method is more "TikZy", i.e. closer to how the standard TikZ styles work, than the tkz-euclide macros, which are more like pstricks, which I have left behind. However, this is just a personal opinion, and might not be shared by others.)
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Note that n1
is a fraction, and could in principle not be well defined. If you ever encounter this case, just change the ordering, e.g. do draw[circle through 3 points={B}{C}{A}];
or something along those lines.)
ADDENDUM: Explanation of the analytic formula.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
path[use as bounding box] (-1,-4) rectangle (6,4);
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
ifnumX=1
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (start) at (2.5,0){Starting point: 3 points.};
foreach Y in {A,B,C}
{draw[-latex] (start) to[out=90,in=-90] (Y) node[above=2pt]{Y}; }
fi
ifnumX=2
coordinate (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $) coordinate(aux1);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) coordinate(aux2) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
where the lines that run through and are orthogonal to the edges intersect.};
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=45,in=-90] (aux1);
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=135,in=-90] (aux2);
fi
ifnumX=3
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){Call the points in the
middle $P_2$ and $P_4$, and the differences $P_1=A-B$ and $P_3=B-C$. Then the
orthogonal lines will fulfill
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_2+alpha,y_1\
y_2-alpha,x_1\
end{array}right) ]
and
[gamma_2(beta)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_4+beta,y_3\
y_4-beta,x_3\
end{array}right);. ]
};
fi
ifnumX=4
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
then simply determined by
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~gamma_2(beta);, ]
which has the solution
[
alpha~=~frac{-(x_2cdot x_3) + x_3cdot x_4 + y_3cdot (y_4-y_2 )}{x_3cdot y_1 - x_1cdot y_3};.
]
This is texttt{textbackslash n1} in the Tiemph{k}Z style texttt{circle through 3 points}.
};
fi
ifnumX=5
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,-0.1){Once we have the center,
determining the radius (texttt{textbackslash n2}) is trivial, and we can draw
the circle with a simple texttt{insert path}.};
fi
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
A new node style, based on the derivation below plus the information that one can use intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
, which I learned from AndréC's nice answer
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in },
at={(p5)},
circle through= {(#1)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C},draw=blue]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Just for fun: an analytic solution based on calc
only. (My personal opinion, though, is that this method is more "TikZy", i.e. closer to how the standard TikZ styles work, than the tkz-euclide macros, which are more like pstricks, which I have left behind. However, this is just a personal opinion, and might not be shared by others.)
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Note that n1
is a fraction, and could in principle not be well defined. If you ever encounter this case, just change the ordering, e.g. do draw[circle through 3 points={B}{C}{A}];
or something along those lines.)
ADDENDUM: Explanation of the analytic formula.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)-(#2)$),p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p3=($(#1)-(#3)$),p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),p5=(#1),n1={(-(x2*x3) + x3*x4 + y3*(-y2 +
y4))/(x3*y1 - x1*y3)},n2={veclen(x5-x2-n1*y1,y5-y2+n1*x1)} in
({x2+n1*y1},{y2-n1*x1}) circle (n2)}
}}
begin{document}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
path[use as bounding box] (-1,-4) rectangle (6,4);
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
ifnumX=1
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (start) at (2.5,0){Starting point: 3 points.};
foreach Y in {A,B,C}
{draw[-latex] (start) to[out=90,in=-90] (Y) node[above=2pt]{Y}; }
fi
ifnumX=2
coordinate (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $) coordinate(aux1);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) coordinate(aux2) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
where the lines that run through and are orthogonal to the edges intersect.};
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=45,in=-90] (aux1);
draw[-latex] (int) to[out=135,in=-90] (aux2);
fi
ifnumX=3
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){Call the points in the
middle $P_2$ and $P_4$, and the differences $P_1=A-B$ and $P_3=B-C$. Then the
orthogonal lines will fulfill
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_2+alpha,y_1\
y_2-alpha,x_1\
end{array}right) ]
and
[gamma_2(beta)~=~left(begin{array}{c}
x_4+beta,y_3\
y_4-beta,x_3\
end{array}right);. ]
};
fi
ifnumX=4
coordinate[label=below:$P_2$] (auxAB) at ($ (A)!.5!(B) $);
coordinate[label=below:$P_4$] (auxBC) at ($ (B)!.5!(C) $);
foreach Y in {auxAB,auxBC}
{fill (Y) circle (1pt);}
draw (A) -- (B) -- (C);
draw ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxAB)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
draw ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!90:(B) $) -- ($ (auxBC)!1.2cm!-90:(B) $);
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,0){The center of the circle is
then simply determined by
[gamma_1(alpha)~=~gamma_2(beta);, ]
which has the solution
[
alpha~=~frac{-(x_2cdot x_3) + x_3cdot x_4 + y_3cdot (y_4-y_2 )}{x_3cdot y_1 - x_1cdot y_3};.
]
This is texttt{textbackslash n1} in the Tiemph{k}Z style texttt{circle through 3 points}.
};
fi
ifnumX=5
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
node[anchor=north,text width=7cm] (int) at (2.5,-0.1){Once we have the center,
determining the radius (texttt{textbackslash n2}) is trivial, and we can draw
the circle with a simple texttt{insert path}.};
fi
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
edited Nov 21 at 21:43
answered Nov 21 at 19:07
marmot
78.3k487166
78.3k487166
(+1) Give the analytical expression also, if possible :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:16
@nidhin It is in the code, isn't it?
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:20
Yes it is there. I meant outside the code. Mathematical expression.
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:25
@nidhin Done. There is a simple animation that you can create withconvert -delay 800 -loop 0 -density 300 -alpha remove <pdf> <gif>
, wherepdf
is the pdf file that gets created if you compile the lower code, andgif
the name of the animated gif you will create.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:54
Wow. That was more than expected. :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 20:03
add a comment |
(+1) Give the analytical expression also, if possible :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:16
@nidhin It is in the code, isn't it?
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:20
Yes it is there. I meant outside the code. Mathematical expression.
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:25
@nidhin Done. There is a simple animation that you can create withconvert -delay 800 -loop 0 -density 300 -alpha remove <pdf> <gif>
, wherepdf
is the pdf file that gets created if you compile the lower code, andgif
the name of the animated gif you will create.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:54
Wow. That was more than expected. :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 20:03
(+1) Give the analytical expression also, if possible :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:16
(+1) Give the analytical expression also, if possible :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:16
@nidhin It is in the code, isn't it?
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:20
@nidhin It is in the code, isn't it?
– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:20
Yes it is there. I meant outside the code. Mathematical expression.
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:25
Yes it is there. I meant outside the code. Mathematical expression.
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 19:25
@nidhin Done. There is a simple animation that you can create with
convert -delay 800 -loop 0 -density 300 -alpha remove <pdf> <gif>
, where pdf
is the pdf file that gets created if you compile the lower code, and gif
the name of the animated gif you will create.– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:54
@nidhin Done. There is a simple animation that you can create with
convert -delay 800 -loop 0 -density 300 -alpha remove <pdf> <gif>
, where pdf
is the pdf file that gets created if you compile the lower code, and gif
the name of the animated gif you will create.– marmot
Nov 21 at 19:54
Wow. That was more than expected. :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 20:03
Wow. That was more than expected. :)
– nidhin
Nov 21 at 20:03
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
You can use tkz-euclide
like this:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
tkzCircumCenter(A,B,C)tkzGetPoint{O}
tkzDrawCircle(O,A)
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Modified from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/16024/8650)
If you chose to use tkz-euclide
, then you should consider to do all of your drawing with it - depending on what it is - you can e.g. define your points with tkzDefPoint(x,y)
.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
You can use tkz-euclide
like this:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
tkzCircumCenter(A,B,C)tkzGetPoint{O}
tkzDrawCircle(O,A)
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Modified from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/16024/8650)
If you chose to use tkz-euclide
, then you should consider to do all of your drawing with it - depending on what it is - you can e.g. define your points with tkzDefPoint(x,y)
.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
You can use tkz-euclide
like this:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
tkzCircumCenter(A,B,C)tkzGetPoint{O}
tkzDrawCircle(O,A)
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Modified from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/16024/8650)
If you chose to use tkz-euclide
, then you should consider to do all of your drawing with it - depending on what it is - you can e.g. define your points with tkzDefPoint(x,y)
.
You can use tkz-euclide
like this:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tkz-euclide}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
node[draw,line width=2pt] [circle through={(A)(B)(C)}] {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
tkzCircumCenter(A,B,C)tkzGetPoint{O}
tkzDrawCircle(O,A)
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
(Modified from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/16024/8650)
If you chose to use tkz-euclide
, then you should consider to do all of your drawing with it - depending on what it is - you can e.g. define your points with tkzDefPoint(x,y)
.
answered Nov 21 at 17:52
hpekristiansen
4,87862863
4,87862863
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just for comparison purpose.
documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-eucl}
begin{document}
foreach i in {1.0,1.2,...,4.0}{
begin{pspicture}(-5,-5)(5,5)
pstTriangle(4;30){A}(4;90){B}(i;-45){C}
pstCircleABC{A}{B}{C}{O}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just for comparison purpose.
documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-eucl}
begin{document}
foreach i in {1.0,1.2,...,4.0}{
begin{pspicture}(-5,-5)(5,5)
pstTriangle(4;30){A}(4;90){B}(i;-45){C}
pstCircleABC{A}{B}{C}{O}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Just for comparison purpose.
documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-eucl}
begin{document}
foreach i in {1.0,1.2,...,4.0}{
begin{pspicture}(-5,-5)(5,5)
pstTriangle(4;30){A}(4;90){B}(i;-45){C}
pstCircleABC{A}{B}{C}{O}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
Just for comparison purpose.
documentclass[pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-eucl}
begin{document}
foreach i in {1.0,1.2,...,4.0}{
begin{pspicture}(-5,-5)(5,5)
pstTriangle(4;30){A}(4;90){B}(i;-45){C}
pstCircleABC{A}{B}{C}{O}
end{pspicture}}
end{document}
answered Nov 21 at 18:00
Artificial Stupidity
4,8711833
4,8711833
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The code
node [draw] at (1,1) [circle through={(A)}] {};
draw a circle whose center is at (1,1)
and passes through A
. In this case the center of the Circumscribed circle has to be calculated before using through
.
I just used the Straightedge and compass construction to calculate the center and then drew circle. The basic idea is that all the perpendicular bisectors of the edges of a triangle meet at the same point: the circumcenter.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{through,intersections}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
path[name path=c1] (A) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c2] (B) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c3] (C) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name intersections={of = c1 and c2}];
path[name path=o1] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = c2 and c3}];
path[name path=o2] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = o1 and o2}];
node[draw,line width=2pt] at (intersection-1) [circle through={(A)}]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The code
node [draw] at (1,1) [circle through={(A)}] {};
draw a circle whose center is at (1,1)
and passes through A
. In this case the center of the Circumscribed circle has to be calculated before using through
.
I just used the Straightedge and compass construction to calculate the center and then drew circle. The basic idea is that all the perpendicular bisectors of the edges of a triangle meet at the same point: the circumcenter.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{through,intersections}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
path[name path=c1] (A) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c2] (B) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c3] (C) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name intersections={of = c1 and c2}];
path[name path=o1] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = c2 and c3}];
path[name path=o2] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = o1 and o2}];
node[draw,line width=2pt] at (intersection-1) [circle through={(A)}]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
The code
node [draw] at (1,1) [circle through={(A)}] {};
draw a circle whose center is at (1,1)
and passes through A
. In this case the center of the Circumscribed circle has to be calculated before using through
.
I just used the Straightedge and compass construction to calculate the center and then drew circle. The basic idea is that all the perpendicular bisectors of the edges of a triangle meet at the same point: the circumcenter.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{through,intersections}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
path[name path=c1] (A) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c2] (B) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c3] (C) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name intersections={of = c1 and c2}];
path[name path=o1] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = c2 and c3}];
path[name path=o2] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = o1 and o2}];
node[draw,line width=2pt] at (intersection-1) [circle through={(A)}]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
The code
node [draw] at (1,1) [circle through={(A)}] {};
draw a circle whose center is at (1,1)
and passes through A
. In this case the center of the Circumscribed circle has to be calculated before using through
.
I just used the Straightedge and compass construction to calculate the center and then drew circle. The basic idea is that all the perpendicular bisectors of the edges of a triangle meet at the same point: the circumcenter.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{through,intersections}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
path[name path=c1] (A) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c2] (B) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name path=c3] (C) circle[radius=5cm];
path[name intersections={of = c1 and c2}];
path[name path=o1] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = c2 and c3}];
path[name path=o2] (intersection-1)--(intersection-2);
path[name intersections={of = o1 and o2}];
node[draw,line width=2pt] at (intersection-1) [circle through={(A)}]{};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
edited Nov 21 at 19:05
answered Nov 21 at 18:32
nidhin
1,890922
1,890922
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Just for fun, another solution inspired by the @marmot solution that calculates the intersection of two defined perpendicular bisector with the calc
library.
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in
node at (p5) [draw,line width=2pt,circle through= {(#1)}]{}}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Nice! I didn't know that one could usep1
etc. inintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
. (I guess it will be more elegant if you manage to eliminatedraw,line width=2pt,
from the node sincepath[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
also draws the path, which is not whatpath
usually does.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 21:11
@marmot It is simple to deleteline width=2pt
which is a given parameter of the lucky1928 question. On the other hand, it is more difficult to deletedraw
. To do that, you have to find a way to pass the parameters to the node, I'll get down to work and explore (finally!) thekey handlers
. I just saw that you succeeded! Congratulations!
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 21:56
I really could only do that after I learned theintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
thing from you, which is much better than the analytic computation of the intersection point, and presumably also more stable (even though the analytic derivation was fun ;-). Thanks a lot! (My aim was to create a style that behaves the same way ascircle through
, which your observation made possible, so thanks again!)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:03
@marmot Thank you very much and I have to return the compliment because it is by adapting your solution that I learned how to useinsert path
and that I am finally motivated to learnkey handlers
.
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 22:07
I really like that you acknowledge other posts (and I try to do the same). I wish all users would do that.... ;-)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:11
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Just for fun, another solution inspired by the @marmot solution that calculates the intersection of two defined perpendicular bisector with the calc
library.
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in
node at (p5) [draw,line width=2pt,circle through= {(#1)}]{}}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Nice! I didn't know that one could usep1
etc. inintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
. (I guess it will be more elegant if you manage to eliminatedraw,line width=2pt,
from the node sincepath[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
also draws the path, which is not whatpath
usually does.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 21:11
@marmot It is simple to deleteline width=2pt
which is a given parameter of the lucky1928 question. On the other hand, it is more difficult to deletedraw
. To do that, you have to find a way to pass the parameters to the node, I'll get down to work and explore (finally!) thekey handlers
. I just saw that you succeeded! Congratulations!
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 21:56
I really could only do that after I learned theintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
thing from you, which is much better than the analytic computation of the intersection point, and presumably also more stable (even though the analytic derivation was fun ;-). Thanks a lot! (My aim was to create a style that behaves the same way ascircle through
, which your observation made possible, so thanks again!)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:03
@marmot Thank you very much and I have to return the compliment because it is by adapting your solution that I learned how to useinsert path
and that I am finally motivated to learnkey handlers
.
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 22:07
I really like that you acknowledge other posts (and I try to do the same). I wish all users would do that.... ;-)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:11
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Just for fun, another solution inspired by the @marmot solution that calculates the intersection of two defined perpendicular bisector with the calc
library.
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in
node at (p5) [draw,line width=2pt,circle through= {(#1)}]{}}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Just for fun, another solution inspired by the @marmot solution that calculates the intersection of two defined perpendicular bisector with the calc
library.
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
tikzset{circle through 3 points/.style n args={3}{%
insert path={let p1=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)$),
p2=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)$),
p3=($(#1)!0.5!(#2)!1!-90:(#2)$),
p4=($(#1)!0.5!(#3)!1!90:(#3)$),
p5=(intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4)
in
node at (p5) [draw,line width=2pt,circle through= {(#1)}]{}}
}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=1pt,fill=red] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered Nov 21 at 20:57
AndréC
6,24711140
6,24711140
Nice! I didn't know that one could usep1
etc. inintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
. (I guess it will be more elegant if you manage to eliminatedraw,line width=2pt,
from the node sincepath[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
also draws the path, which is not whatpath
usually does.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 21:11
@marmot It is simple to deleteline width=2pt
which is a given parameter of the lucky1928 question. On the other hand, it is more difficult to deletedraw
. To do that, you have to find a way to pass the parameters to the node, I'll get down to work and explore (finally!) thekey handlers
. I just saw that you succeeded! Congratulations!
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 21:56
I really could only do that after I learned theintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
thing from you, which is much better than the analytic computation of the intersection point, and presumably also more stable (even though the analytic derivation was fun ;-). Thanks a lot! (My aim was to create a style that behaves the same way ascircle through
, which your observation made possible, so thanks again!)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:03
@marmot Thank you very much and I have to return the compliment because it is by adapting your solution that I learned how to useinsert path
and that I am finally motivated to learnkey handlers
.
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 22:07
I really like that you acknowledge other posts (and I try to do the same). I wish all users would do that.... ;-)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:11
add a comment |
Nice! I didn't know that one could usep1
etc. inintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
. (I guess it will be more elegant if you manage to eliminatedraw,line width=2pt,
from the node sincepath[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
also draws the path, which is not whatpath
usually does.
– marmot
Nov 21 at 21:11
@marmot It is simple to deleteline width=2pt
which is a given parameter of the lucky1928 question. On the other hand, it is more difficult to deletedraw
. To do that, you have to find a way to pass the parameters to the node, I'll get down to work and explore (finally!) thekey handlers
. I just saw that you succeeded! Congratulations!
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 21:56
I really could only do that after I learned theintersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
thing from you, which is much better than the analytic computation of the intersection point, and presumably also more stable (even though the analytic derivation was fun ;-). Thanks a lot! (My aim was to create a style that behaves the same way ascircle through
, which your observation made possible, so thanks again!)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:03
@marmot Thank you very much and I have to return the compliment because it is by adapting your solution that I learned how to useinsert path
and that I am finally motivated to learnkey handlers
.
– AndréC
Nov 21 at 22:07
I really like that you acknowledge other posts (and I try to do the same). I wish all users would do that.... ;-)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:11
Nice! I didn't know that one could use
p1
etc. in intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
. (I guess it will be more elegant if you manage to eliminate draw,line width=2pt,
from the node since path[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
also draws the path, which is not what path
usually does.– marmot
Nov 21 at 21:11
Nice! I didn't know that one could use
p1
etc. in intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
. (I guess it will be more elegant if you manage to eliminate draw,line width=2pt,
from the node since path[circle through 3 points={A}{B}{C}];
also draws the path, which is not what path
usually does.– marmot
Nov 21 at 21:11
@marmot It is simple to delete
line width=2pt
which is a given parameter of the lucky1928 question. On the other hand, it is more difficult to delete draw
. To do that, you have to find a way to pass the parameters to the node, I'll get down to work and explore (finally!) the key handlers
. I just saw that you succeeded! Congratulations!– AndréC
Nov 21 at 21:56
@marmot It is simple to delete
line width=2pt
which is a given parameter of the lucky1928 question. On the other hand, it is more difficult to delete draw
. To do that, you have to find a way to pass the parameters to the node, I'll get down to work and explore (finally!) the key handlers
. I just saw that you succeeded! Congratulations!– AndréC
Nov 21 at 21:56
I really could only do that after I learned the
intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
thing from you, which is much better than the analytic computation of the intersection point, and presumably also more stable (even though the analytic derivation was fun ;-). Thanks a lot! (My aim was to create a style that behaves the same way as circle through
, which your observation made possible, so thanks again!)– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:03
I really could only do that after I learned the
intersection of p1--p3 and p2--p4
thing from you, which is much better than the analytic computation of the intersection point, and presumably also more stable (even though the analytic derivation was fun ;-). Thanks a lot! (My aim was to create a style that behaves the same way as circle through
, which your observation made possible, so thanks again!)– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:03
@marmot Thank you very much and I have to return the compliment because it is by adapting your solution that I learned how to use
insert path
and that I am finally motivated to learn key handlers
.– AndréC
Nov 21 at 22:07
@marmot Thank you very much and I have to return the compliment because it is by adapting your solution that I learned how to use
insert path
and that I am finally motivated to learn key handlers
.– AndréC
Nov 21 at 22:07
I really like that you acknowledge other posts (and I try to do the same). I wish all users would do that.... ;-)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:11
I really like that you acknowledge other posts (and I try to do the same). I wish all users would do that.... ;-)
– marmot
Nov 21 at 22:11
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Just for fun with @AndréC's answer:
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw let p1=($(A)!0.5!(B)$),
p2=($(A)!0.5!(C)$),
p3=($(p1)!2!-90:(B)$),
p4=($(p1)!2!90:(B)$),
p5=($(p2)!2!-90:(C)$),
p6=($(p2)!2!90:(C)$),
p7=(intersection of p3--p4 and p5--p6)
in
(A) -- (B)
(A) -- (C)
(p3) -- (p4)
(p5) -- (p6)
foreach j in {1,...,7} {
node[circle,minimum size=2pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=j] at(pj) {}
}
node[draw,line width=1pt,circle through= {(A)}] at (p7) {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=5pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=i] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Just for fun with @AndréC's answer:
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw let p1=($(A)!0.5!(B)$),
p2=($(A)!0.5!(C)$),
p3=($(p1)!2!-90:(B)$),
p4=($(p1)!2!90:(B)$),
p5=($(p2)!2!-90:(C)$),
p6=($(p2)!2!90:(C)$),
p7=(intersection of p3--p4 and p5--p6)
in
(A) -- (B)
(A) -- (C)
(p3) -- (p4)
(p5) -- (p6)
foreach j in {1,...,7} {
node[circle,minimum size=2pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=j] at(pj) {}
}
node[draw,line width=1pt,circle through= {(A)}] at (p7) {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=5pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=i] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Just for fun with @AndréC's answer:
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw let p1=($(A)!0.5!(B)$),
p2=($(A)!0.5!(C)$),
p3=($(p1)!2!-90:(B)$),
p4=($(p1)!2!90:(B)$),
p5=($(p2)!2!-90:(C)$),
p6=($(p2)!2!90:(C)$),
p7=(intersection of p3--p4 and p5--p6)
in
(A) -- (B)
(A) -- (C)
(p3) -- (p4)
(p5) -- (p6)
foreach j in {1,...,7} {
node[circle,minimum size=2pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=j] at(pj) {}
}
node[draw,line width=1pt,circle through= {(A)}] at (p7) {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=5pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=i] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Just for fun with @AndréC's answer:
documentclass[tikz,border=5mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
coordinate (A) at (1,1);
coordinate (B) at (2,2);
coordinate (C) at (3,1.5);
draw let p1=($(A)!0.5!(B)$),
p2=($(A)!0.5!(C)$),
p3=($(p1)!2!-90:(B)$),
p4=($(p1)!2!90:(B)$),
p5=($(p2)!2!-90:(C)$),
p6=($(p2)!2!90:(C)$),
p7=(intersection of p3--p4 and p5--p6)
in
(A) -- (B)
(A) -- (C)
(p3) -- (p4)
(p5) -- (p6)
foreach j in {1,...,7} {
node[circle,minimum size=2pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=j] at(pj) {}
}
node[draw,line width=1pt,circle through= {(A)}] at (p7) {};
foreach i in {A,B,C} {
node[circle,minimum size=5pt,fill=red,inner sep=0,label=i] at(i) {};
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
edited Nov 21 at 22:26
answered Nov 21 at 22:14
beetlej
45429
45429
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461161%2fdrawing-a-circle-through-3-non-collinear-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown