SonarQube static code analysis report getting published on local sonar server not on remote sonar server
When I use this command on my local system the static code analysis report is generate perfectly on my local dashboard but when I am replacing it with the remote sonar url it always shows 0 bugs,0 vulnerabilities.
Sonar server version is different for the two ; can it be the reason for this?
sonar-scanner -Dsonar.projectKey=foo -Dsonar.sources=. -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 -Dsonar.projectName=bar -Dsonar.projectVersion=1
sonarqube sonarqube-scan
add a comment |
When I use this command on my local system the static code analysis report is generate perfectly on my local dashboard but when I am replacing it with the remote sonar url it always shows 0 bugs,0 vulnerabilities.
Sonar server version is different for the two ; can it be the reason for this?
sonar-scanner -Dsonar.projectKey=foo -Dsonar.sources=. -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 -Dsonar.projectName=bar -Dsonar.projectVersion=1
sonarqube sonarqube-scan
add a comment |
When I use this command on my local system the static code analysis report is generate perfectly on my local dashboard but when I am replacing it with the remote sonar url it always shows 0 bugs,0 vulnerabilities.
Sonar server version is different for the two ; can it be the reason for this?
sonar-scanner -Dsonar.projectKey=foo -Dsonar.sources=. -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 -Dsonar.projectName=bar -Dsonar.projectVersion=1
sonarqube sonarqube-scan
When I use this command on my local system the static code analysis report is generate perfectly on my local dashboard but when I am replacing it with the remote sonar url it always shows 0 bugs,0 vulnerabilities.
Sonar server version is different for the two ; can it be the reason for this?
sonar-scanner -Dsonar.projectKey=foo -Dsonar.sources=. -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 -Dsonar.projectName=bar -Dsonar.projectVersion=1
sonarqube sonarqube-scan
sonarqube sonarqube-scan
asked Nov 23 '18 at 10:19
Akash Jain
647
647
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, if the version is different it can be definitely the reason for the analysis to show different results, as analyzers which are used to analyze the code are downloaded from the server. Also your quality profile (i.e which rules are enabled) is defined by the server.
Update: it is working fine for one of my projects with remote sonar server but not for the other and both are in ruby language. I am getting below stack trace on localhost with the project having this issue but still it pushes perfectly on localhost: ERROR: Failed to get Node.js version. No CSS files will be analyzed. java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "node": error=2, No such file or directory . Logs on the remote sonar server does not have any errors but it does not publish coverage somehow!
– Akash Jain
Nov 28 '18 at 6:37
@AkashJain this seems to be an unrelated problem, post a separate question, you can also use the community forum community.sonarsource.com
– Tibor Blenessy
Nov 28 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53444777%2fsonarqube-static-code-analysis-report-getting-published-on-local-sonar-server-no%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, if the version is different it can be definitely the reason for the analysis to show different results, as analyzers which are used to analyze the code are downloaded from the server. Also your quality profile (i.e which rules are enabled) is defined by the server.
Update: it is working fine for one of my projects with remote sonar server but not for the other and both are in ruby language. I am getting below stack trace on localhost with the project having this issue but still it pushes perfectly on localhost: ERROR: Failed to get Node.js version. No CSS files will be analyzed. java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "node": error=2, No such file or directory . Logs on the remote sonar server does not have any errors but it does not publish coverage somehow!
– Akash Jain
Nov 28 '18 at 6:37
@AkashJain this seems to be an unrelated problem, post a separate question, you can also use the community forum community.sonarsource.com
– Tibor Blenessy
Nov 28 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
Yes, if the version is different it can be definitely the reason for the analysis to show different results, as analyzers which are used to analyze the code are downloaded from the server. Also your quality profile (i.e which rules are enabled) is defined by the server.
Update: it is working fine for one of my projects with remote sonar server but not for the other and both are in ruby language. I am getting below stack trace on localhost with the project having this issue but still it pushes perfectly on localhost: ERROR: Failed to get Node.js version. No CSS files will be analyzed. java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "node": error=2, No such file or directory . Logs on the remote sonar server does not have any errors but it does not publish coverage somehow!
– Akash Jain
Nov 28 '18 at 6:37
@AkashJain this seems to be an unrelated problem, post a separate question, you can also use the community forum community.sonarsource.com
– Tibor Blenessy
Nov 28 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
Yes, if the version is different it can be definitely the reason for the analysis to show different results, as analyzers which are used to analyze the code are downloaded from the server. Also your quality profile (i.e which rules are enabled) is defined by the server.
Yes, if the version is different it can be definitely the reason for the analysis to show different results, as analyzers which are used to analyze the code are downloaded from the server. Also your quality profile (i.e which rules are enabled) is defined by the server.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 11:40
Tibor Blenessy
2,4691731
2,4691731
Update: it is working fine for one of my projects with remote sonar server but not for the other and both are in ruby language. I am getting below stack trace on localhost with the project having this issue but still it pushes perfectly on localhost: ERROR: Failed to get Node.js version. No CSS files will be analyzed. java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "node": error=2, No such file or directory . Logs on the remote sonar server does not have any errors but it does not publish coverage somehow!
– Akash Jain
Nov 28 '18 at 6:37
@AkashJain this seems to be an unrelated problem, post a separate question, you can also use the community forum community.sonarsource.com
– Tibor Blenessy
Nov 28 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
Update: it is working fine for one of my projects with remote sonar server but not for the other and both are in ruby language. I am getting below stack trace on localhost with the project having this issue but still it pushes perfectly on localhost: ERROR: Failed to get Node.js version. No CSS files will be analyzed. java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "node": error=2, No such file or directory . Logs on the remote sonar server does not have any errors but it does not publish coverage somehow!
– Akash Jain
Nov 28 '18 at 6:37
@AkashJain this seems to be an unrelated problem, post a separate question, you can also use the community forum community.sonarsource.com
– Tibor Blenessy
Nov 28 '18 at 7:51
Update: it is working fine for one of my projects with remote sonar server but not for the other and both are in ruby language. I am getting below stack trace on localhost with the project having this issue but still it pushes perfectly on localhost: ERROR: Failed to get Node.js version. No CSS files will be analyzed. java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "node": error=2, No such file or directory . Logs on the remote sonar server does not have any errors but it does not publish coverage somehow!
– Akash Jain
Nov 28 '18 at 6:37
Update: it is working fine for one of my projects with remote sonar server but not for the other and both are in ruby language. I am getting below stack trace on localhost with the project having this issue but still it pushes perfectly on localhost: ERROR: Failed to get Node.js version. No CSS files will be analyzed. java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "node": error=2, No such file or directory . Logs on the remote sonar server does not have any errors but it does not publish coverage somehow!
– Akash Jain
Nov 28 '18 at 6:37
@AkashJain this seems to be an unrelated problem, post a separate question, you can also use the community forum community.sonarsource.com
– Tibor Blenessy
Nov 28 '18 at 7:51
@AkashJain this seems to be an unrelated problem, post a separate question, you can also use the community forum community.sonarsource.com
– Tibor Blenessy
Nov 28 '18 at 7:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53444777%2fsonarqube-static-code-analysis-report-getting-published-on-local-sonar-server-no%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown