“Hard to understate” versus “Hard to overstate”












0














Which is the correct expression - "hard to understate" or "hard to overstate" when trying to use for emphasis? Searching on Google, both expressions appear popular but overstate has about 10x the results.



For example, the Washington Post writes the sentence "It would be hard to understate the positive effect the manufacturer has made in the area." where the effect was legitimately very positive. This seems counter intuitive.



Is either variant correct in the same way "could/couldn't care less" are both common expressions?










share|improve this question



























    0














    Which is the correct expression - "hard to understate" or "hard to overstate" when trying to use for emphasis? Searching on Google, both expressions appear popular but overstate has about 10x the results.



    For example, the Washington Post writes the sentence "It would be hard to understate the positive effect the manufacturer has made in the area." where the effect was legitimately very positive. This seems counter intuitive.



    Is either variant correct in the same way "could/couldn't care less" are both common expressions?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Which is the correct expression - "hard to understate" or "hard to overstate" when trying to use for emphasis? Searching on Google, both expressions appear popular but overstate has about 10x the results.



      For example, the Washington Post writes the sentence "It would be hard to understate the positive effect the manufacturer has made in the area." where the effect was legitimately very positive. This seems counter intuitive.



      Is either variant correct in the same way "could/couldn't care less" are both common expressions?










      share|improve this question













      Which is the correct expression - "hard to understate" or "hard to overstate" when trying to use for emphasis? Searching on Google, both expressions appear popular but overstate has about 10x the results.



      For example, the Washington Post writes the sentence "It would be hard to understate the positive effect the manufacturer has made in the area." where the effect was legitimately very positive. This seems counter intuitive.



      Is either variant correct in the same way "could/couldn't care less" are both common expressions?







      expressions






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      GBa

      3442514




      3442514






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          We correctly use "hard to overstate" about things which are at, or near, the maximum or high end of some scale. It is hard to overstate the danger of touching high-voltage wires. It is hard to overstate the destructive power of an atomic bomb.



          We use "hard to understate" about things which are at, or near, the minimum or lower end of some scale. It is hard to understate the fun there is to be had at a funeral. It was hard to understate what you could see from the cheap seats at a Neil Diamond concert.



          It has frequently been remarked by students of language how often people get these around the wrong way, or use 'understate' when they mean 'overstate', for example here and here. Similar topic ("cannot/must not underestimate") here A Google search for "hard to understate" (with quote marks) mostly returns examples of misuse.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Your funeral example seems backwards to me: since very little fun is usually had at funerals, it’s very hard to understate how much fun is had, or very hard overstate how little fun is had. If you understate how little fun is had, you’re back to overstating how much fun is had. Aren’t implicit double (triple? Quadruple?) negatives fun?
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            5 hours ago










          • Yup. I have been thinking the same thing. Likewise Neil Diamond. Answer edited. Thanks.
            – Michael Harvey
            4 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478643%2fhard-to-understate-versus-hard-to-overstate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          We correctly use "hard to overstate" about things which are at, or near, the maximum or high end of some scale. It is hard to overstate the danger of touching high-voltage wires. It is hard to overstate the destructive power of an atomic bomb.



          We use "hard to understate" about things which are at, or near, the minimum or lower end of some scale. It is hard to understate the fun there is to be had at a funeral. It was hard to understate what you could see from the cheap seats at a Neil Diamond concert.



          It has frequently been remarked by students of language how often people get these around the wrong way, or use 'understate' when they mean 'overstate', for example here and here. Similar topic ("cannot/must not underestimate") here A Google search for "hard to understate" (with quote marks) mostly returns examples of misuse.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Your funeral example seems backwards to me: since very little fun is usually had at funerals, it’s very hard to understate how much fun is had, or very hard overstate how little fun is had. If you understate how little fun is had, you’re back to overstating how much fun is had. Aren’t implicit double (triple? Quadruple?) negatives fun?
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            5 hours ago










          • Yup. I have been thinking the same thing. Likewise Neil Diamond. Answer edited. Thanks.
            – Michael Harvey
            4 hours ago


















          2














          We correctly use "hard to overstate" about things which are at, or near, the maximum or high end of some scale. It is hard to overstate the danger of touching high-voltage wires. It is hard to overstate the destructive power of an atomic bomb.



          We use "hard to understate" about things which are at, or near, the minimum or lower end of some scale. It is hard to understate the fun there is to be had at a funeral. It was hard to understate what you could see from the cheap seats at a Neil Diamond concert.



          It has frequently been remarked by students of language how often people get these around the wrong way, or use 'understate' when they mean 'overstate', for example here and here. Similar topic ("cannot/must not underestimate") here A Google search for "hard to understate" (with quote marks) mostly returns examples of misuse.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Your funeral example seems backwards to me: since very little fun is usually had at funerals, it’s very hard to understate how much fun is had, or very hard overstate how little fun is had. If you understate how little fun is had, you’re back to overstating how much fun is had. Aren’t implicit double (triple? Quadruple?) negatives fun?
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            5 hours ago










          • Yup. I have been thinking the same thing. Likewise Neil Diamond. Answer edited. Thanks.
            – Michael Harvey
            4 hours ago
















          2












          2








          2






          We correctly use "hard to overstate" about things which are at, or near, the maximum or high end of some scale. It is hard to overstate the danger of touching high-voltage wires. It is hard to overstate the destructive power of an atomic bomb.



          We use "hard to understate" about things which are at, or near, the minimum or lower end of some scale. It is hard to understate the fun there is to be had at a funeral. It was hard to understate what you could see from the cheap seats at a Neil Diamond concert.



          It has frequently been remarked by students of language how often people get these around the wrong way, or use 'understate' when they mean 'overstate', for example here and here. Similar topic ("cannot/must not underestimate") here A Google search for "hard to understate" (with quote marks) mostly returns examples of misuse.






          share|improve this answer














          We correctly use "hard to overstate" about things which are at, or near, the maximum or high end of some scale. It is hard to overstate the danger of touching high-voltage wires. It is hard to overstate the destructive power of an atomic bomb.



          We use "hard to understate" about things which are at, or near, the minimum or lower end of some scale. It is hard to understate the fun there is to be had at a funeral. It was hard to understate what you could see from the cheap seats at a Neil Diamond concert.



          It has frequently been remarked by students of language how often people get these around the wrong way, or use 'understate' when they mean 'overstate', for example here and here. Similar topic ("cannot/must not underestimate") here A Google search for "hard to understate" (with quote marks) mostly returns examples of misuse.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago

























          answered 5 hours ago









          Michael Harvey

          5,56211019




          5,56211019








          • 1




            Your funeral example seems backwards to me: since very little fun is usually had at funerals, it’s very hard to understate how much fun is had, or very hard overstate how little fun is had. If you understate how little fun is had, you’re back to overstating how much fun is had. Aren’t implicit double (triple? Quadruple?) negatives fun?
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            5 hours ago










          • Yup. I have been thinking the same thing. Likewise Neil Diamond. Answer edited. Thanks.
            – Michael Harvey
            4 hours ago
















          • 1




            Your funeral example seems backwards to me: since very little fun is usually had at funerals, it’s very hard to understate how much fun is had, or very hard overstate how little fun is had. If you understate how little fun is had, you’re back to overstating how much fun is had. Aren’t implicit double (triple? Quadruple?) negatives fun?
            – Janus Bahs Jacquet
            5 hours ago










          • Yup. I have been thinking the same thing. Likewise Neil Diamond. Answer edited. Thanks.
            – Michael Harvey
            4 hours ago










          1




          1




          Your funeral example seems backwards to me: since very little fun is usually had at funerals, it’s very hard to understate how much fun is had, or very hard overstate how little fun is had. If you understate how little fun is had, you’re back to overstating how much fun is had. Aren’t implicit double (triple? Quadruple?) negatives fun?
          – Janus Bahs Jacquet
          5 hours ago




          Your funeral example seems backwards to me: since very little fun is usually had at funerals, it’s very hard to understate how much fun is had, or very hard overstate how little fun is had. If you understate how little fun is had, you’re back to overstating how much fun is had. Aren’t implicit double (triple? Quadruple?) negatives fun?
          – Janus Bahs Jacquet
          5 hours ago












          Yup. I have been thinking the same thing. Likewise Neil Diamond. Answer edited. Thanks.
          – Michael Harvey
          4 hours ago






          Yup. I have been thinking the same thing. Likewise Neil Diamond. Answer edited. Thanks.
          – Michael Harvey
          4 hours ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478643%2fhard-to-understate-versus-hard-to-overstate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          Alexandru Averescu

          Trompette piccolo