Looking for way to keep vendor code in a component chunk on dynamic import











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the huge chart library which is about 400kb and only one component uses chart library. The component is loaded only on button click event. Therefore, it should not even be loaded when loading a page for the first time.



Using react-loadable for dynamic import.



Current behavior is that webpack creates shared chunk such as



page1~page2~page3.js
page1~page2~page3~page4.js


So when I visit page1 it(probably react-loadable) loads all the shared chunks even though is not mounded yet.
Is there any way I chunk the vendor with component? cuz other chunks works like the way I expect. Fetching on mount!



Webpack optimization splitChunks set up



optimization: {
splitChunks: {
maxAsyncRequests: 20,
maxInitialRequests: 20,
minChunks: 2,
chunks: 'all',
cacheGroups: {
styles: {
name: 'styles',
test: /.css$/,
chunks: 'all',
enforce: true
},
}
}
},


.babelrc



{
"presets": ["react", "es2015" , "stage-2"],
"plugins": [
"syntax-dynamic-import",
["babel-plugin-webpack-alias", {"config": "${PWD}/config/aliases/aliases.config.js"}],
"transform-decorators-legacy",
"transform-runtime",
"react-loadable/babel",
"dynamic-import-node"
]
}









share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I have the huge chart library which is about 400kb and only one component uses chart library. The component is loaded only on button click event. Therefore, it should not even be loaded when loading a page for the first time.



    Using react-loadable for dynamic import.



    Current behavior is that webpack creates shared chunk such as



    page1~page2~page3.js
    page1~page2~page3~page4.js


    So when I visit page1 it(probably react-loadable) loads all the shared chunks even though is not mounded yet.
    Is there any way I chunk the vendor with component? cuz other chunks works like the way I expect. Fetching on mount!



    Webpack optimization splitChunks set up



    optimization: {
    splitChunks: {
    maxAsyncRequests: 20,
    maxInitialRequests: 20,
    minChunks: 2,
    chunks: 'all',
    cacheGroups: {
    styles: {
    name: 'styles',
    test: /.css$/,
    chunks: 'all',
    enforce: true
    },
    }
    }
    },


    .babelrc



    {
    "presets": ["react", "es2015" , "stage-2"],
    "plugins": [
    "syntax-dynamic-import",
    ["babel-plugin-webpack-alias", {"config": "${PWD}/config/aliases/aliases.config.js"}],
    "transform-decorators-legacy",
    "transform-runtime",
    "react-loadable/babel",
    "dynamic-import-node"
    ]
    }









    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I have the huge chart library which is about 400kb and only one component uses chart library. The component is loaded only on button click event. Therefore, it should not even be loaded when loading a page for the first time.



      Using react-loadable for dynamic import.



      Current behavior is that webpack creates shared chunk such as



      page1~page2~page3.js
      page1~page2~page3~page4.js


      So when I visit page1 it(probably react-loadable) loads all the shared chunks even though is not mounded yet.
      Is there any way I chunk the vendor with component? cuz other chunks works like the way I expect. Fetching on mount!



      Webpack optimization splitChunks set up



      optimization: {
      splitChunks: {
      maxAsyncRequests: 20,
      maxInitialRequests: 20,
      minChunks: 2,
      chunks: 'all',
      cacheGroups: {
      styles: {
      name: 'styles',
      test: /.css$/,
      chunks: 'all',
      enforce: true
      },
      }
      }
      },


      .babelrc



      {
      "presets": ["react", "es2015" , "stage-2"],
      "plugins": [
      "syntax-dynamic-import",
      ["babel-plugin-webpack-alias", {"config": "${PWD}/config/aliases/aliases.config.js"}],
      "transform-decorators-legacy",
      "transform-runtime",
      "react-loadable/babel",
      "dynamic-import-node"
      ]
      }









      share|improve this question













      I have the huge chart library which is about 400kb and only one component uses chart library. The component is loaded only on button click event. Therefore, it should not even be loaded when loading a page for the first time.



      Using react-loadable for dynamic import.



      Current behavior is that webpack creates shared chunk such as



      page1~page2~page3.js
      page1~page2~page3~page4.js


      So when I visit page1 it(probably react-loadable) loads all the shared chunks even though is not mounded yet.
      Is there any way I chunk the vendor with component? cuz other chunks works like the way I expect. Fetching on mount!



      Webpack optimization splitChunks set up



      optimization: {
      splitChunks: {
      maxAsyncRequests: 20,
      maxInitialRequests: 20,
      minChunks: 2,
      chunks: 'all',
      cacheGroups: {
      styles: {
      name: 'styles',
      test: /.css$/,
      chunks: 'all',
      enforce: true
      },
      }
      }
      },


      .babelrc



      {
      "presets": ["react", "es2015" , "stage-2"],
      "plugins": [
      "syntax-dynamic-import",
      ["babel-plugin-webpack-alias", {"config": "${PWD}/config/aliases/aliases.config.js"}],
      "transform-decorators-legacy",
      "transform-runtime",
      "react-loadable/babel",
      "dynamic-import-node"
      ]
      }






      javascript reactjs webpack react-loadable






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 at 17:11









      Seongjun Kim

      366522




      366522





























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53435654%2flooking-for-way-to-keep-vendor-code-in-a-component-chunk-on-dynamic-import%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53435654%2flooking-for-way-to-keep-vendor-code-in-a-component-chunk-on-dynamic-import%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

          Alexandru Averescu