Filtering 2 lists in a performant way
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have 2 lists:
newUpdates
and updatesToAdd
I first of all need to remove all the occurrences of updatesToAdd
from the newUpdates
list by their Id. Then I need to add all updatesToAdd
back into newUpdates
to prevent duplicates.
It may not be clear why I'm doing this, but I need to swap out multiple occurrences of items that share the same Id (different update type) to then reinsert just one item for that Id with a main/master/catch all update type.
The code I have so far does this, but it runs very slowly. Is there a more performant way to write this?
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>();
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>();
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList();
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
I tried doing:
newUpdates.Union(updatesToAdd).ToList();
However, I still ended up with duplicates in my list.
c# linq
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have 2 lists:
newUpdates
and updatesToAdd
I first of all need to remove all the occurrences of updatesToAdd
from the newUpdates
list by their Id. Then I need to add all updatesToAdd
back into newUpdates
to prevent duplicates.
It may not be clear why I'm doing this, but I need to swap out multiple occurrences of items that share the same Id (different update type) to then reinsert just one item for that Id with a main/master/catch all update type.
The code I have so far does this, but it runs very slowly. Is there a more performant way to write this?
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>();
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>();
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList();
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
I tried doing:
newUpdates.Union(updatesToAdd).ToList();
However, I still ended up with duplicates in my list.
c# linq
1
Use a HashSet forIds
. Solves both your performance and duplicates issue.
– Funk
Nov 22 at 17:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have 2 lists:
newUpdates
and updatesToAdd
I first of all need to remove all the occurrences of updatesToAdd
from the newUpdates
list by their Id. Then I need to add all updatesToAdd
back into newUpdates
to prevent duplicates.
It may not be clear why I'm doing this, but I need to swap out multiple occurrences of items that share the same Id (different update type) to then reinsert just one item for that Id with a main/master/catch all update type.
The code I have so far does this, but it runs very slowly. Is there a more performant way to write this?
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>();
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>();
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList();
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
I tried doing:
newUpdates.Union(updatesToAdd).ToList();
However, I still ended up with duplicates in my list.
c# linq
I have 2 lists:
newUpdates
and updatesToAdd
I first of all need to remove all the occurrences of updatesToAdd
from the newUpdates
list by their Id. Then I need to add all updatesToAdd
back into newUpdates
to prevent duplicates.
It may not be clear why I'm doing this, but I need to swap out multiple occurrences of items that share the same Id (different update type) to then reinsert just one item for that Id with a main/master/catch all update type.
The code I have so far does this, but it runs very slowly. Is there a more performant way to write this?
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>();
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>();
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList();
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
I tried doing:
newUpdates.Union(updatesToAdd).ToList();
However, I still ended up with duplicates in my list.
c# linq
c# linq
edited Nov 22 at 18:02
Uwe Keim
27.3k30128210
27.3k30128210
asked Nov 22 at 17:13
Dave
606
606
1
Use a HashSet forIds
. Solves both your performance and duplicates issue.
– Funk
Nov 22 at 17:22
add a comment |
1
Use a HashSet forIds
. Solves both your performance and duplicates issue.
– Funk
Nov 22 at 17:22
1
1
Use a HashSet for
Ids
. Solves both your performance and duplicates issue.– Funk
Nov 22 at 17:22
Use a HashSet for
Ids
. Solves both your performance and duplicates issue.– Funk
Nov 22 at 17:22
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Why not use Except instead?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.enumerable.except?view=netframework-4.7.2
or Contains is false.
In fact I think you have a bug. I think you want to do this:
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>(); //overall list to add
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>(); //later list to add
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList(); //this line chagned
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53435683%2ffiltering-2-lists-in-a-performant-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Why not use Except instead?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.enumerable.except?view=netframework-4.7.2
or Contains is false.
In fact I think you have a bug. I think you want to do this:
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>(); //overall list to add
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>(); //later list to add
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList(); //this line chagned
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Why not use Except instead?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.enumerable.except?view=netframework-4.7.2
or Contains is false.
In fact I think you have a bug. I think you want to do this:
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>(); //overall list to add
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>(); //later list to add
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList(); //this line chagned
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Why not use Except instead?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.enumerable.except?view=netframework-4.7.2
or Contains is false.
In fact I think you have a bug. I think you want to do this:
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>(); //overall list to add
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>(); //later list to add
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList(); //this line chagned
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
Why not use Except instead?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.enumerable.except?view=netframework-4.7.2
or Contains is false.
In fact I think you have a bug. I think you want to do this:
var newUpdates = new List<Entity>(); //overall list to add
var updatesToAdd = new List<Entity>(); //later list to add
var Ids = updatesToAdd.Select(x => x.Id).ToList(); //this line chagned
newUpdates.RemoveAll(x => Ids.Contains(x.Id));
newUpdates.AddRange(updatesToAdd);
edited Nov 22 at 17:33
answered Nov 22 at 17:24
Jeff Davies
458411
458411
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53435683%2ffiltering-2-lists-in-a-performant-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Use a HashSet for
Ids
. Solves both your performance and duplicates issue.– Funk
Nov 22 at 17:22