Qfyilyi

I've got this little script in sh (Mac OSX 10.6) to look through an array of files. Google has stopped being helpful at this point:

files="*.jpg"

for f in $files

    do

        echo $f | grep -oEi '[0-9]+_([a-z]+)_[0-9a-z]*'

        name=$?

        echo $name

    done

So far (obviously, to you shell gurus) $name merely holds 0, 1 or 2, depending on if grep found that the filename matched the matter provided. What I'd like is to capture what's inside the parens ([a-z]+) and store that to a variable.

I'd like to use grep only, if possible. If not, please no Python or Perl, etc. sed or something like it – I'm new to shell and would like to attack this from the *nix purist angle.

Also, as a super-cool bonus, I'm curious as to how I can concatenate string in shell? Is the group I captured was the string "somename" stored in $name, and I wanted to add the string ".jpg" to the end of it, could I cat $name '.jpg'?

Please explain what's going on, if you've got the time.

If you're using Bash, you don't even have to use grep:

files="*.jpg"

regex="[0-9]+_([a-z]+)_[0-9a-z]*"

for f in $files    # unquoted in order to allow the glob to expand

do

    if [[ $f =~ $regex ]]

    then

        name="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"

        echo "${name}.jpg"    # concatenate strings

        name="${name}.jpg"    # same thing stored in a variable

    else

        echo "$f doesn't match" >&2 # this could get noisy if there are a lot of non-matching files

    fi

done

It's better to put the regex in a variable. Some patterns won't work if included literally.

This uses =~ which is Bash's regex match operator. The results of the match are saved to an array called $BASH_REMATCH. The first capture group is stored in index 1, the second (if any) in index 2, etc. Index zero is the full match.

You should be aware that without anchors, this regex (and the one using grep) will match any of the following examples and more, which may not be what you're looking for:

123_abc_d4e5

xyz123_abc_d4e5

123_abc_d4e5.xyz

xyz123_abc_d4e5.xyz

To eliminate the second and fourth examples, make your regex like this:

^[0-9]+_([a-z]+)_[0-9a-z]*

which says the string must start with one or more digits. The carat represents the beginning of the string. If you add a dollar sign at the end of the regex, like this:

^[0-9]+_([a-z]+)_[0-9a-z]*$

then the third example will also be eliminated since the dot is not among the characters in the regex and the dollar sign represents the end of the string. Note that the fourth example fails this match as well.

If you have GNU grep (around 2.5 or later, I think, when the K operator was added):

name=$(echo "$f" | grep -Po '(?i)[0-9]+_K[a-z]+(?=_[0-9a-z]*)').jpg

The K operator (variable-length look-behind) causes the preceding pattern to match, but doesn't include the match in the result. The fixed-length equivalent is (?<=) - the pattern would be included before the closing parenthesis. You must use K if quantifiers may match strings of different lengths (e.g. +, *, {2,4}).

The (?=) operator matches fixed or variable-length patterns and is called "look-ahead". It also does not include the matched string in the result.

In order to make the match case-insensitive, the (?i) operator is used. It affects the patterns that follow it so its position is significant.

The regex might need to be adjusted depending on whether there are other characters in the filename. You'll note that in this case, I show an example of concatenating a string at the same time that the substring is captured.

This isn't really possible with pure grep, at least not generally.

But if your pattern is suitable, you may be able to use grep multiple times within a pipeline to first reduce your line to a known format, and then to extract just the bit you want. (Although tools like cut and sed are far better at this).

Suppose for the sake of argument that your pattern was a bit simpler: [0-9]+_([a-z]+)_ You could extract this like so:

echo $name | grep -Ei '[0-9]+_[a-z]+_' | grep -oEi '[a-z]+'

The first grep would remove any lines that didn't match your overall patern, the second grep (which has --only-matching specified) would display the alpha portion of the name. This only works because the pattern is suitable: "alpha portion" is specific enough to pull out what you want.

(Aside: Personally I'd use grep + cut to achieve what you are after: echo $name | grep {pattern} | cut -d _ -f 2. This gets cut to parse the line into fields by splitting on the delimiter _, and returns just field 2 (field numbers start at 1)).

Unix philosophy is to have tools which do one thing, and do it well, and combine them to achieve non-trivial tasks, so I'd argue that grep + sed etc is a more Unixy way of doing things :-)

I realize that an answer was already accepted for this, but from a "strictly *nix purist angle" it seems like the right tool for the job is pcregrep, which doesn't seem to have been mentioned yet. Try changing the lines:

    echo $f | grep -oEi '[0-9]+_([a-z]+)_[0-9a-z]*'

    name=$?

to the following:

    name=$(echo $f | pcregrep -o1 -Ei '[0-9]+_([a-z]+)_[0-9a-z]*')

to get only the contents of the capturing group 1.

The pcregrep tool utilizes all of the same syntax you've already used with grep, but implements the functionality that you need.

The parameter -o works just like the grep version if it is bare, but it also accepts a numeric parameter in pcregrep, which indicates which capturing group you want to show.

With this solution there is a bare minimum of change required in the script. You simply replace one modular utility with another and tweak the parameters.

Interesting Note: You can use multiple -o arguments to return multiple capture groups in the order in which they appear on the line.