& at the end of command
I have startup script line:
pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
Meanings:
>> /dev/null - redirect stdout to null device
2>&1 - redirect stderr to stdout (that is redirected to null device)
but what very last &
means?
bash scripts lubuntu stdout
add a comment |
I have startup script line:
pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
Meanings:
>> /dev/null - redirect stdout to null device
2>&1 - redirect stderr to stdout (that is redirected to null device)
but what very last &
means?
bash scripts lubuntu stdout
Runs the program in background..., Related: askubuntu.com/questions/106351/… also related: superuser.com/questions/513496/…
– Ravexina
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have startup script line:
pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
Meanings:
>> /dev/null - redirect stdout to null device
2>&1 - redirect stderr to stdout (that is redirected to null device)
but what very last &
means?
bash scripts lubuntu stdout
I have startup script line:
pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
Meanings:
>> /dev/null - redirect stdout to null device
2>&1 - redirect stderr to stdout (that is redirected to null device)
but what very last &
means?
bash scripts lubuntu stdout
bash scripts lubuntu stdout
asked 1 hour ago
vico
1,12472345
1,12472345
Runs the program in background..., Related: askubuntu.com/questions/106351/… also related: superuser.com/questions/513496/…
– Ravexina
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Runs the program in background..., Related: askubuntu.com/questions/106351/… also related: superuser.com/questions/513496/…
– Ravexina
1 hour ago
Runs the program in background..., Related: askubuntu.com/questions/106351/… also related: superuser.com/questions/513496/…
– Ravexina
1 hour ago
Runs the program in background..., Related: askubuntu.com/questions/106351/… also related: superuser.com/questions/513496/…
– Ravexina
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It means run the command in the background. The calling script continues rather than blocking until the called command completes.
add a comment |
What is the & terminator ?
The trailing &
operator at the end of a command is used to put commands into background. This is actually a standard syntax specified by POSIX standard:
Asynchronous Lists
If a command is terminated by the control operator
( '&' ), the shell shall execute the command
asynchronously in a subshell. This means that the shell shall not wait
for the command to finish before executing the next command.
The format for running a command in the background is:
command1 & [command2 & ... ]
From the definition you can see that &
also serves as command terminator for lists of commands, much like ;
does. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
there is only one command in the list.
Sequential ; lists vs asynchronous & lists
More generally,
echo Hello ; echo World ;
and
echo Hello & echo World &
are two examples of lists terminated by the ;
and &
operators, with the difference that &
terminated list will hide the output by redirecting output to /dev/null
if job control is enabled, and in fact that's exactly what the standard also states:
If job control is disabled (see set, -m), the standard input for an
asynchronous list, before any explicit redirections are performed,
shall be considered to be assigned to a file that has the same
properties as /dev/null. This shall not happen if job control is
enabled. In all cases, explicit redirection of standard input shall
override this activity.
Thus, in the specific example redirecting >> /dev/null
may be unnecessary, if job control is enabled by the shell.
Note also, that from the definition we mentioned earlier, &
executes commands in subshell. By contrast, the ;
terminated list is executed in current shell. There's also difference in exit statuses. For &
the standard says:
The exit status of an asynchronous list shall be zero.
This is significant when you want to put multiple commands in background. When you write a script or command you will have to chose commands for which you don't care if they failed or not, or you will have to find a way to handle the non-zero ( error ) exit status. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
running in background should have some way of indicating if it failed or not, however judging that you use 2>&1
you are hiding error output by redirecting, and you probably assume the script should not fail.
By contrast, ;
exit status is defined as:
The exit status of a sequential list shall be the exit status of the
last command in the list.
Again, this has implications on how you write a sequential list of commands in command-line and how you want things to be handled if some of the commands in the list failed.
The fact that this is POSIX definition means that all Bourne-like shells, meaning bash
, dash
, and ksh
must support it.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1107124%2fat-the-end-of-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It means run the command in the background. The calling script continues rather than blocking until the called command completes.
add a comment |
It means run the command in the background. The calling script continues rather than blocking until the called command completes.
add a comment |
It means run the command in the background. The calling script continues rather than blocking until the called command completes.
It means run the command in the background. The calling script continues rather than blocking until the called command completes.
answered 1 hour ago
Robert Longson
259410
259410
add a comment |
add a comment |
What is the & terminator ?
The trailing &
operator at the end of a command is used to put commands into background. This is actually a standard syntax specified by POSIX standard:
Asynchronous Lists
If a command is terminated by the control operator
( '&' ), the shell shall execute the command
asynchronously in a subshell. This means that the shell shall not wait
for the command to finish before executing the next command.
The format for running a command in the background is:
command1 & [command2 & ... ]
From the definition you can see that &
also serves as command terminator for lists of commands, much like ;
does. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
there is only one command in the list.
Sequential ; lists vs asynchronous & lists
More generally,
echo Hello ; echo World ;
and
echo Hello & echo World &
are two examples of lists terminated by the ;
and &
operators, with the difference that &
terminated list will hide the output by redirecting output to /dev/null
if job control is enabled, and in fact that's exactly what the standard also states:
If job control is disabled (see set, -m), the standard input for an
asynchronous list, before any explicit redirections are performed,
shall be considered to be assigned to a file that has the same
properties as /dev/null. This shall not happen if job control is
enabled. In all cases, explicit redirection of standard input shall
override this activity.
Thus, in the specific example redirecting >> /dev/null
may be unnecessary, if job control is enabled by the shell.
Note also, that from the definition we mentioned earlier, &
executes commands in subshell. By contrast, the ;
terminated list is executed in current shell. There's also difference in exit statuses. For &
the standard says:
The exit status of an asynchronous list shall be zero.
This is significant when you want to put multiple commands in background. When you write a script or command you will have to chose commands for which you don't care if they failed or not, or you will have to find a way to handle the non-zero ( error ) exit status. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
running in background should have some way of indicating if it failed or not, however judging that you use 2>&1
you are hiding error output by redirecting, and you probably assume the script should not fail.
By contrast, ;
exit status is defined as:
The exit status of a sequential list shall be the exit status of the
last command in the list.
Again, this has implications on how you write a sequential list of commands in command-line and how you want things to be handled if some of the commands in the list failed.
The fact that this is POSIX definition means that all Bourne-like shells, meaning bash
, dash
, and ksh
must support it.
add a comment |
What is the & terminator ?
The trailing &
operator at the end of a command is used to put commands into background. This is actually a standard syntax specified by POSIX standard:
Asynchronous Lists
If a command is terminated by the control operator
( '&' ), the shell shall execute the command
asynchronously in a subshell. This means that the shell shall not wait
for the command to finish before executing the next command.
The format for running a command in the background is:
command1 & [command2 & ... ]
From the definition you can see that &
also serves as command terminator for lists of commands, much like ;
does. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
there is only one command in the list.
Sequential ; lists vs asynchronous & lists
More generally,
echo Hello ; echo World ;
and
echo Hello & echo World &
are two examples of lists terminated by the ;
and &
operators, with the difference that &
terminated list will hide the output by redirecting output to /dev/null
if job control is enabled, and in fact that's exactly what the standard also states:
If job control is disabled (see set, -m), the standard input for an
asynchronous list, before any explicit redirections are performed,
shall be considered to be assigned to a file that has the same
properties as /dev/null. This shall not happen if job control is
enabled. In all cases, explicit redirection of standard input shall
override this activity.
Thus, in the specific example redirecting >> /dev/null
may be unnecessary, if job control is enabled by the shell.
Note also, that from the definition we mentioned earlier, &
executes commands in subshell. By contrast, the ;
terminated list is executed in current shell. There's also difference in exit statuses. For &
the standard says:
The exit status of an asynchronous list shall be zero.
This is significant when you want to put multiple commands in background. When you write a script or command you will have to chose commands for which you don't care if they failed or not, or you will have to find a way to handle the non-zero ( error ) exit status. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
running in background should have some way of indicating if it failed or not, however judging that you use 2>&1
you are hiding error output by redirecting, and you probably assume the script should not fail.
By contrast, ;
exit status is defined as:
The exit status of a sequential list shall be the exit status of the
last command in the list.
Again, this has implications on how you write a sequential list of commands in command-line and how you want things to be handled if some of the commands in the list failed.
The fact that this is POSIX definition means that all Bourne-like shells, meaning bash
, dash
, and ksh
must support it.
add a comment |
What is the & terminator ?
The trailing &
operator at the end of a command is used to put commands into background. This is actually a standard syntax specified by POSIX standard:
Asynchronous Lists
If a command is terminated by the control operator
( '&' ), the shell shall execute the command
asynchronously in a subshell. This means that the shell shall not wait
for the command to finish before executing the next command.
The format for running a command in the background is:
command1 & [command2 & ... ]
From the definition you can see that &
also serves as command terminator for lists of commands, much like ;
does. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
there is only one command in the list.
Sequential ; lists vs asynchronous & lists
More generally,
echo Hello ; echo World ;
and
echo Hello & echo World &
are two examples of lists terminated by the ;
and &
operators, with the difference that &
terminated list will hide the output by redirecting output to /dev/null
if job control is enabled, and in fact that's exactly what the standard also states:
If job control is disabled (see set, -m), the standard input for an
asynchronous list, before any explicit redirections are performed,
shall be considered to be assigned to a file that has the same
properties as /dev/null. This shall not happen if job control is
enabled. In all cases, explicit redirection of standard input shall
override this activity.
Thus, in the specific example redirecting >> /dev/null
may be unnecessary, if job control is enabled by the shell.
Note also, that from the definition we mentioned earlier, &
executes commands in subshell. By contrast, the ;
terminated list is executed in current shell. There's also difference in exit statuses. For &
the standard says:
The exit status of an asynchronous list shall be zero.
This is significant when you want to put multiple commands in background. When you write a script or command you will have to chose commands for which you don't care if they failed or not, or you will have to find a way to handle the non-zero ( error ) exit status. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
running in background should have some way of indicating if it failed or not, however judging that you use 2>&1
you are hiding error output by redirecting, and you probably assume the script should not fail.
By contrast, ;
exit status is defined as:
The exit status of a sequential list shall be the exit status of the
last command in the list.
Again, this has implications on how you write a sequential list of commands in command-line and how you want things to be handled if some of the commands in the list failed.
The fact that this is POSIX definition means that all Bourne-like shells, meaning bash
, dash
, and ksh
must support it.
What is the & terminator ?
The trailing &
operator at the end of a command is used to put commands into background. This is actually a standard syntax specified by POSIX standard:
Asynchronous Lists
If a command is terminated by the control operator
( '&' ), the shell shall execute the command
asynchronously in a subshell. This means that the shell shall not wait
for the command to finish before executing the next command.
The format for running a command in the background is:
command1 & [command2 & ... ]
From the definition you can see that &
also serves as command terminator for lists of commands, much like ;
does. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
there is only one command in the list.
Sequential ; lists vs asynchronous & lists
More generally,
echo Hello ; echo World ;
and
echo Hello & echo World &
are two examples of lists terminated by the ;
and &
operators, with the difference that &
terminated list will hide the output by redirecting output to /dev/null
if job control is enabled, and in fact that's exactly what the standard also states:
If job control is disabled (see set, -m), the standard input for an
asynchronous list, before any explicit redirections are performed,
shall be considered to be assigned to a file that has the same
properties as /dev/null. This shall not happen if job control is
enabled. In all cases, explicit redirection of standard input shall
override this activity.
Thus, in the specific example redirecting >> /dev/null
may be unnecessary, if job control is enabled by the shell.
Note also, that from the definition we mentioned earlier, &
executes commands in subshell. By contrast, the ;
terminated list is executed in current shell. There's also difference in exit statuses. For &
the standard says:
The exit status of an asynchronous list shall be zero.
This is significant when you want to put multiple commands in background. When you write a script or command you will have to chose commands for which you don't care if they failed or not, or you will have to find a way to handle the non-zero ( error ) exit status. In your specific example, pyprogramm >> /dev/null 2>&1 &
running in background should have some way of indicating if it failed or not, however judging that you use 2>&1
you are hiding error output by redirecting, and you probably assume the script should not fail.
By contrast, ;
exit status is defined as:
The exit status of a sequential list shall be the exit status of the
last command in the list.
Again, this has implications on how you write a sequential list of commands in command-line and how you want things to be handled if some of the commands in the list failed.
The fact that this is POSIX definition means that all Bourne-like shells, meaning bash
, dash
, and ksh
must support it.
edited 2 mins ago
answered 21 mins ago
Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
69.7k9144306
69.7k9144306
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1107124%2fat-the-end-of-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Runs the program in background..., Related: askubuntu.com/questions/106351/… also related: superuser.com/questions/513496/…
– Ravexina
1 hour ago