Does there exist a continuous 2-to-1 function from the sphere to itself?











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I am interested in the following question:




Does there exist a continuous function $f:S^2to S^2$ such that, for any $pin S^2$, $|f^{-1}({p})|=2$?




I suspect the answer is no, but I don't know how to prove it. All I know right now is that $f$ cannot be a covering map.



For if $f$ is a covering map, take any $pin S^2$. Then $f$ restricts to a covering map from $S^2backslash f^{-1}(p)$ to $S^2backslash {p}$. However, the fundamental group of $S^2backslash f^{-1}(p)$ is $mathbb{Z}$ and the fundamental group of $S^2backslash {p}$ is trivial. That $f$ is a covering then gives that there is an injective homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}$ to the trivial group, a contradiction. Thus $f$ cannot be a covering map.



That's all I've got so far. Any more progress is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I am interested in the following question:




    Does there exist a continuous function $f:S^2to S^2$ such that, for any $pin S^2$, $|f^{-1}({p})|=2$?




    I suspect the answer is no, but I don't know how to prove it. All I know right now is that $f$ cannot be a covering map.



    For if $f$ is a covering map, take any $pin S^2$. Then $f$ restricts to a covering map from $S^2backslash f^{-1}(p)$ to $S^2backslash {p}$. However, the fundamental group of $S^2backslash f^{-1}(p)$ is $mathbb{Z}$ and the fundamental group of $S^2backslash {p}$ is trivial. That $f$ is a covering then gives that there is an injective homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}$ to the trivial group, a contradiction. Thus $f$ cannot be a covering map.



    That's all I've got so far. Any more progress is greatly appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I am interested in the following question:




      Does there exist a continuous function $f:S^2to S^2$ such that, for any $pin S^2$, $|f^{-1}({p})|=2$?




      I suspect the answer is no, but I don't know how to prove it. All I know right now is that $f$ cannot be a covering map.



      For if $f$ is a covering map, take any $pin S^2$. Then $f$ restricts to a covering map from $S^2backslash f^{-1}(p)$ to $S^2backslash {p}$. However, the fundamental group of $S^2backslash f^{-1}(p)$ is $mathbb{Z}$ and the fundamental group of $S^2backslash {p}$ is trivial. That $f$ is a covering then gives that there is an injective homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}$ to the trivial group, a contradiction. Thus $f$ cannot be a covering map.



      That's all I've got so far. Any more progress is greatly appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am interested in the following question:




      Does there exist a continuous function $f:S^2to S^2$ such that, for any $pin S^2$, $|f^{-1}({p})|=2$?




      I suspect the answer is no, but I don't know how to prove it. All I know right now is that $f$ cannot be a covering map.



      For if $f$ is a covering map, take any $pin S^2$. Then $f$ restricts to a covering map from $S^2backslash f^{-1}(p)$ to $S^2backslash {p}$. However, the fundamental group of $S^2backslash f^{-1}(p)$ is $mathbb{Z}$ and the fundamental group of $S^2backslash {p}$ is trivial. That $f$ is a covering then gives that there is an injective homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}$ to the trivial group, a contradiction. Thus $f$ cannot be a covering map.



      That's all I've got so far. Any more progress is greatly appreciated.







      general-topology algebraic-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      Nathaniel B

      821514




      821514






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          There is no such map.



          For is there is, I prove below that it has to be a covering map and you proved that it is not possible
          (or simply remark that from the fact that $S^2$ is simply connected, it admits no non-trivial covering).



          Let's assume $f$ satisfies your hypothesis.
          By compactness of $S^2$, there exists a $varepsilon>0$
          such that for all $p in S^2$, for all $x neq y in f^{-1}(p)$
          we have $d(x,y) ge 2 varepsilon$ (where $d$ is any compatible metric on the sphere).
          Consequently, for any $x in S^2$, if $U$ is the closed ball centered at $x$ and radius $varepsilon$ then the restriction of $f$ to $U$ is injective, and by compactness, an homeomorphism onto its image.



          We've shown that $f$ is a local homeomorphism, and by hypothesis it is surjective.
          As its domain is compact and its range connected, it is a covering.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033601%2fdoes-there-exist-a-continuous-2-to-1-function-from-the-sphere-to-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            5
            down vote













            There is no such map.



            For is there is, I prove below that it has to be a covering map and you proved that it is not possible
            (or simply remark that from the fact that $S^2$ is simply connected, it admits no non-trivial covering).



            Let's assume $f$ satisfies your hypothesis.
            By compactness of $S^2$, there exists a $varepsilon>0$
            such that for all $p in S^2$, for all $x neq y in f^{-1}(p)$
            we have $d(x,y) ge 2 varepsilon$ (where $d$ is any compatible metric on the sphere).
            Consequently, for any $x in S^2$, if $U$ is the closed ball centered at $x$ and radius $varepsilon$ then the restriction of $f$ to $U$ is injective, and by compactness, an homeomorphism onto its image.



            We've shown that $f$ is a local homeomorphism, and by hypothesis it is surjective.
            As its domain is compact and its range connected, it is a covering.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              5
              down vote













              There is no such map.



              For is there is, I prove below that it has to be a covering map and you proved that it is not possible
              (or simply remark that from the fact that $S^2$ is simply connected, it admits no non-trivial covering).



              Let's assume $f$ satisfies your hypothesis.
              By compactness of $S^2$, there exists a $varepsilon>0$
              such that for all $p in S^2$, for all $x neq y in f^{-1}(p)$
              we have $d(x,y) ge 2 varepsilon$ (where $d$ is any compatible metric on the sphere).
              Consequently, for any $x in S^2$, if $U$ is the closed ball centered at $x$ and radius $varepsilon$ then the restriction of $f$ to $U$ is injective, and by compactness, an homeomorphism onto its image.



              We've shown that $f$ is a local homeomorphism, and by hypothesis it is surjective.
              As its domain is compact and its range connected, it is a covering.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                5
                down vote










                up vote
                5
                down vote









                There is no such map.



                For is there is, I prove below that it has to be a covering map and you proved that it is not possible
                (or simply remark that from the fact that $S^2$ is simply connected, it admits no non-trivial covering).



                Let's assume $f$ satisfies your hypothesis.
                By compactness of $S^2$, there exists a $varepsilon>0$
                such that for all $p in S^2$, for all $x neq y in f^{-1}(p)$
                we have $d(x,y) ge 2 varepsilon$ (where $d$ is any compatible metric on the sphere).
                Consequently, for any $x in S^2$, if $U$ is the closed ball centered at $x$ and radius $varepsilon$ then the restriction of $f$ to $U$ is injective, and by compactness, an homeomorphism onto its image.



                We've shown that $f$ is a local homeomorphism, and by hypothesis it is surjective.
                As its domain is compact and its range connected, it is a covering.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                There is no such map.



                For is there is, I prove below that it has to be a covering map and you proved that it is not possible
                (or simply remark that from the fact that $S^2$ is simply connected, it admits no non-trivial covering).



                Let's assume $f$ satisfies your hypothesis.
                By compactness of $S^2$, there exists a $varepsilon>0$
                such that for all $p in S^2$, for all $x neq y in f^{-1}(p)$
                we have $d(x,y) ge 2 varepsilon$ (where $d$ is any compatible metric on the sphere).
                Consequently, for any $x in S^2$, if $U$ is the closed ball centered at $x$ and radius $varepsilon$ then the restriction of $f$ to $U$ is injective, and by compactness, an homeomorphism onto its image.



                We've shown that $f$ is a local homeomorphism, and by hypothesis it is surjective.
                As its domain is compact and its range connected, it is a covering.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                Florentin MB

                663




                663






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033601%2fdoes-there-exist-a-continuous-2-to-1-function-from-the-sphere-to-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

                    Alexandru Averescu

                    Trompette piccolo